AppleInsider StaffA Dutch court on Wednesday ruled that Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tablets do not infringe on a certain Apple patent regarding multitouch technology.
The ruling on Apple's multitouch utility patent, first reported by Reuters, is another Dutch loss for the company, and comes months after an appeals court found that Samsung did not infringe on the iPad's design patents with the Galaxy 10.1.
"With these products Samsung does not infringe the claims that Apple has made," the court said in its ruling.
The Hague found that Samsung did not infringe on Apple's pinch-to-zoom patent, a property asserted multiple times against competing handset makers to little success. Apple was previously denied an injunction request of Samsung's products based on the patent by the Dutch court in 2011. The multitouch patent was also asserted unsuccessfully in Britain against HTC, as well as in Germany against Samsung and Motorola.
Wednesday's decision marks another setback for Apple in the company's ongoing patent battle with Samsung. It was reported on Tuesday that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office tentatively invalidated Apple's "rubber banding" patent, an IP that was successfully asserted against Samsung in the landmark Apple v. Samsung jury trial. With the California suit still going through post-trial motions, Presiding Judge Lucy Koh will be taking the new information into consideration, especially in regard to Samsung's Rule 50 motions, or those that overrule the jury.
Apple has the chance to appeal the USPTO's decision, or somehow persuade the agency that its invention was new and valid. It is unclear how Judge Koh will decide, but if the patent is found to be invalid, all claims against Samsung associated with the invention will be nullified.
Malcolm Owen
Christine McKee
Amber Neely
25 Comments
Like I said a couple of days ago after a similar decision by a court in Holland... it's perfectly legal to smoke dope in cafés in that country. Go figure!
Like I said a couple of days ago after a similar decision by a court in Holland... it's perfectly legal to smoke dope in cafés in that country. Go figure!
Where have youseen that it is legal smoking dope?
Where have youseen that it is legal smoking dope?
For starters... http://www.coffeeshop.freeuk.com/GenCS.html
Like I said a couple of days ago after a similar decision by a court in Holland... it's perfectly legal to smoke dope in cafés in that country. Go figure!
Actually it's not legal, it's just decriminalised.
Besides, at least half of those that partake are 'tourists' (German, Belgian, French, UK, US) - not Dutch.
@fotoformat You're posting nonsense. I'm from The Netherlands (aka Holland). Those 'cafes' you're talking about are 'designated places' aka coffeeshops (which has nothing to do with coffee other than you can also buy coffee over there). Smoking weed is only allowed in those shops (or at home, but officially it's illegal to transport it from that shop to your home) and these are the only places where they sell it legally. You're not allowed to smoke and/or buy it outside of those places. In my town you can get a fine of 140 euros for smoking weed outside. It's quite regulated as a matter of fact. Again, it's just being tolerated to a certain degree by the government. Officially, it's not even legal. There's actually a new law being introduced in the south of The Netherlands which forbids foreigners (mainly French and Belgian tourists) to buy it in those shops, unlike what was the case before May 1st this year. After 1st of Jan 2013, this is supposed to become the law for the entire country. Only native Dutch people who have to become members of those shops by showing a certain identification are allowed to buy weed.