Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple's iPad mini seen as 'winning template' for launching low-cost iPhone

Apple surprised many last year when it priced the iPad mini at $329 — more than $100 higher than the Amazon Kindle Fire and Google Nexus 7. But the same premium approach will probably be used to successfully introduce a more affordable iPhone, a new analysis concludes.

This week, Mark Moskowitz and Gokul Hariharan of J.P. Morgan took a stab at the prospect of a low-cost iPhone. They expect that Apple would sell such a device in the second half of 2013 priced between $350 and $400 — a cost that may prove higher than some market watchers expect.

But rather than be disappointed by those price points, investors should look to the iPad mini as a "winning template" for Apple's strategy, Moskowitz and Hariharan argue. Instead, they believe a contract-free iPhone priced under $400 would be a "very attractive" product for many consumers.

An iPhone priced between $350 and $450 could also affect market trends and lower what J.P. Morgan calls the "smartphone price pyramid." Moskowitz and Hariharan said that while currently mid-level smartphones don't see much volume, Apple could change the market trends with a reasonably priced iPhone — just like the company has done in the past with the iPad and iPod.

"Apple usually creates new demand when it steps into a price band — for example, the $300-$400 price range for tablets did not have much demand (most of the growth had been at the $499+ or $199 range) before the launch of the iPad mini," they wrote. "However, after the launch of Pad mini, this segment has become one of the largest parts of the market, even convincing many suers to upgrade from cheaper tablets to the iPad mini."

JP Morgan

Apple's current crossroads in the smartphone market is similar to where the company was 30 years ago in the PC space, Moskowitz and Hariharan believe. At one point, Apple had more than a quarter of the PC market, but it faced competition from IBM PC clones and Microsoft's Windows platform.

"If Apple doesn't move into the mainstream, then its ecosystem advantage (already has more than 300 million iCloud users) is likely to be eroded by Android, which is growing very quickly," they said. "The move to lower price points may come at the expense of margins in the short term, but we believe that the opportunity to expand the iOS ecosystem could pay off in the long term through non-product revenue streams."

Multiple rumors have pegged the launch of a low-cost iPhone for later this year. Market watchers believe Apple will be compelled to launch such a product, particularly to gain market share in emerging markets like China and Brazil, where customers do not typically purchase phones with a contract subsidy.

One projection from last month suggested a low-cost iPhone could net Apple 11 percent share of that market segment by 2014. But many others outside of Moskowitz and Hariharan have called for Apple to launch an iPhone in the $300 price range, slightly below what J.P. Morgan expects.



30 Comments

slurpy 5390 comments · 15 Years

..and the Mini is still cheaper than Samsung's Note 8 by $100. Not sure what the hell Samsung is thinking with that one, a shittier tablet all around priced significantly higher than the mini. Massive bezel, shitty as **** build quality, thicker, heavier, etc.

solipsismx 19562 comments · 13 Years

[quote name="Slurpy" url="/t/157349/apples-ipad-mini-seen-as-winning-template-for-launching-low-cost-iphone#post_2321238"]..and the Mini is still cheaper than Samsung's Note 8 by $100. Not sure what the hell Samsung is thinking with that one, a shittier tablet all around priced significantly higher than the mini. Massive bezel, shitty as **** build quality, thicker, heavier, etc.[/quote] It's $70 and it does have that Wacom digitizer built-in. I have no argument as to why the average user would want that but I do think that tech is still quite pricey would seems to account for the Note prices across the board. I do hope Apple eventually adds a digitizer to their iPad lineup once the costs are reduced. The overall design of the Note 8.0 seems to be something designed before the iPad mini debut and I expect their next one to reduce the size and weight to follow the iPad mini. It also uses that horrible 16:9 display which is still smaller than the area of the 7.8" iPad mini; even Acer is using a 7.85" 4:3 display on their $169 tablet.

r00fus 245 comments · 16 Years

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slurpy 

..and the Mini is still cheaper than Samsung's Note 8 by $100. Not sure what the hell Samsung is thinking with that one, a shittier tablet all around priced significantly higher than the mini. Massive bezel, shitty as **** build quality, thicker, heavier, etc.

 

And that's the cutthroat android market for you - Scamsung's Note 8 will die a quiet sales death, while Acer's Iconia A1 @$169 will be heralded as the "iPad mini killer".

 

And how do these manufacturers maintain any margins at all?

gazoobee 3753 comments · 15 Years

Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider 

... Mark Moskowitz and Gokul Hariharan ... expect that Apple would sell such a device ... priced between $350 and $400 a cost that may prove higher than ... market watchers expect. ...

 

Yes, but if it's sold in different sizes like every other phone, then it will be three prices.  

 

So, say their low-end estimate is off by 50 bucks, then the cheap iPhone will be $200 for the base model, $300 for the 32GB and $400 for the 64GB, averaging at $300.  

mattbookair 172 comments · 14 Years

If Apple comes out with a phone at $400, analysts was say it's too expensive for emerging markets. If they sell one for $300, those EXACT same analysts will complain Apple's profit margins are going to take too big hit, and that iPhone 5s sales will be cannibalised. Regardless, Apple will make tons of money, as they have in every quarter for the past decade. Analysts aren't really relevant now. Apple is a clear value stock, which continues to have solid growth potential. I can think of fewer more optimal investments while it's below $500.