AppleInsider Staff
Apple is targeting 19 hours of battery life under mixed usage conditions for its upcoming Apple Watch wearable, consistent with Apple CEO Tim Cook's estimate that users will want to charge the device daily.
When Cook unveiled Apple Watch in September, he was careful to paint in broad strokes, revealing a wide range of features, but little in the way of device specifications. The Apple chief later commented that that owners will "wind up charging it daily," though the company has remained tight lipped over the past four months.
On Thursday, people familiar with Apple's plans shed light on the situation, saying that as of 2014 the company targeted battery life at 19 hours of mixed usage, reports 9to5Mac. More specifically, Apple was aiming to squeeze out 2.5 to 4 hours in "active" app use, 3 days in standby and 4 days in sleep mode.
However, sources warn that a first-generation version may not reach Apple's goals. The same people say current standard use estimates put Apple Watch battery life at around 3.5 hours, dropping to 2.5 hours under heavy load, while power-saving passive modes can milk 2 to 3 days.
Apple is still tweaking software to find the right mix of performance and survivability. For example, the company is targeting 4 hours of continuous exercise tracking when linked to an iPhone, suggesting raw data is handed off to the more capable handset for processing.
Battery life continues to be one of the most significant technical hurdles for smartwatch manufacturers and Apple faces the same predicament with its small form factor device. Apple Watch packs in a custom-designed S1 system-on-chip approximately as powerful as the A5 processor, as well as a Retina-quality display, both major draws on what is expected to be a relatively low-capacity battery cell.
Apple has not yet set a firm release date for Apple Watch, but holds to an "early 2015" launch.
Charles Martin
Malcolm Owen
William Gallagher
Christine McKee
Wesley Hilliard
146 Comments
Isn't the beauty of a high end watch supposed to be NOT having to wind(charge) it? Good luck with this. The message on this product so far is too mixed
Definitely a tough product to properly state battery life. There is no defined pattern of usage. But its definitely not a product you stare at with the screen on for hours or even minutes at a time. Like every watch that came before it, you glance at it when you need to. Even adding the actionable notifications into the mix, your interaction with it will still be minuscule compared to an iPhone. All it has to do is last a whole day under what becomes 'normal' usage for such a thing. I think its going to do exactly that, so they already nailed it. There will be the trolls that insist it needs to last 2 days, or 3, or 50...but I don't see what the big deal is about charging it every night. I'm not gonna sleep with damn thing on. So when I take it off, it get sets on the charging stand. The only "battery life" concern is whether or not you easily get through a whole day. Sounds like it will.
Isn't the beauty of a 1. high end watch supposed to be NOT having to charge it? Good luck with this. 2. The message on this product so far is too mixed.
1. Its as much a watch as the iPhone is a phone.
2. It couldn't possibly be any clearer.
It's a stepping stone. Early adopters will live with the limited battery life. Technology will eventually catch up.
In time we can expect mobile devices embedded in our bodies with a 30 year battery life:
After 30 years, you can renew it at a communal charging station:
Didn't the 1G iPhone have 5 hours of talk time? That worked out fine. I'm sure Apple won't release something that can't be used for its intended purpose.