Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple scrapped advanced Apple Watch health monitoring features due to reliability issues

Last updated

In designing its first wearable device in the Apple Watch, Apple looked to incorporate a variety of highly advanced health functions with an eye on creating a holistic monitoring device, but ultimately scrapped those plans due to technological and regulatory hurdles.

According to The Wall Street Journal, sources claim Apple Watch was supposed to be much more than the device unveiled last year and slated to launch in April. Specifically, Apple executives wanted to produce a cutting edge health-monitoring tool, one capable of measuring a user's blood pressure, heart rate, stress level and more, said people familiar with the matter.

The publication says the setbacks forced Apple executives into a corner when it came to marketing the device to the general consumer. As it stands, Apple Watch boasts a variety of sensors, including accelerometers, touch inputs and a bespoke optical heart rate sensor, the latter of which connects to the iOS Health app for fitness and wellness tracking. While polished and presented in a slick package, Apple Watch is powered by technology on a par with competing devices running flavors of Android.

Aside from catchall smartwatch devices, a number of standalone solutions for off-the-shelf medical style monitoring already exist in the form of products — usually wrist-worn — from smaller manufacturers and startups. For example, the W/Me band incorporates a specialized sensor to measure a user's autonomic nervous system for keeping track of stress levels, while the latest products from Fitbit tout all-day heart rate monitoring.

Apple started development of its Watch four years ago, with an eye on health and fitness, but the project was quickly dubbed a "black hole" for sucking in resources. Advanced technology and component reliability failed to meet Apple's rigorous standards, sources said.

For example, skin conductivity sensors showed promise in early designs, but later testing showed actual results varied person to person, with everything from hairy arms to strap tightness contributing to unreliable readings. The company also investigated incorporating blood pressure and blood oxygen measurement features, but results were inconsistent.

Apple is seemingly investing on health-minded devices and programs, as evidenced by recently discovered job postings, but will take a more mainstream approach for the first generation Watch. Instead of focusing exclusively on health and fitness, the device is being positioned as a niche-filling fashion accessory, iOS compatible smartwatch, iPhone companion and daily communicator, among others.

Apple Watch does, however, sport a few Apple-only features, including Apple Pay integration and WatchKit development tools that are expected to foster a rich ecosystem of bite-sized apps later this year.



86 Comments

thewhitefalcon 10 Years · 4444 comments

This isn't unheard of.

 

 

 

Most never heard of the Wii Vitality Sensor. It was announced...then never discussed again until it was cancelled a few years later. Satoru Iwata later explained that it did work, but the problem was getting it to work for all people; they only had a 90% success rate due to the fact that humans are all a little bit different. I can't help but suspect Apple ran into some of the same issues; the technology just isn't quite there yet. But, with ?Money pushing development, I'm sure they'll achieve it soon enough.

slurpy 15 Years · 5390 comments

I have no problem with this. Glad Apple was ultra-ambitious, then basically culled what wasn't possible or feasible for the time being. Even a feature that only works 90% of the time would a disaster with the scale of Apple sales. The fact that they at least explored every possibility is a reassuring sign. This certainly happens with every single Apple product (or any other product) being developed. When it comes to health stuff, if sensors are giving unreliable/false results for important values, then that could land Apple in alot of hot water and be a PR nightmare.

macvicta 18 Years · 343 comments

That's more like what I was expecting from Apple. The watch that was so good and useful that it could actually force me to start wearing watches again lol. Not feeling the Apple Watch, though.

benjamin frost 11 Years · 7198 comments

It's good to see Apple Insider preparing the Apple faithful for this disappointment. I, too, have been gently hinting at the letdown that awaits. This news certainly solves the puzzle of the missing killer feature. Even then, a medical-grade health device would still have only been a niche market. Can Apple still pull a rabbit out of the hat post-Jobs? The Apple Watch will be the first real test. I, for one, will be fascinated to see how it does.

paxman 17 Years · 4729 comments

[quote name="Benjamin Frost" url="/t/184813/apple-scrapped-advanced-apple-watch-health-monitoring-features-due-to-reliability-issues#post_2677084"]It's good to see Apple Insider preparing the Apple faithful for this disappointment. ... a medical-grade health device would still have only been a niche market.[/quote] A very very big niche. One that would (will) grow year over year with the development of better tech and associated services, and importantly, buy-in from the medical profession.