Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple's over-the-top television service put on hold, says Les Moonves [u]

Last updated

Apple TV owners waiting for an Apple-branded over-the-top television service will likely be twiddling their thumbs well into 2016, as the company has reportedly tapped the brakes on its Internet streaming initiative, according to CBS chief Les Moonves.

Moonves dropped the Apple TV tidbit at Business Insider's Ignition conference in New York on Tuesday, saying he thinks Apple is putting the program on the back burner, reports Bloomberg.

"They've had conversations on it and I think they pressed the hold button," Moonves said. "They were looking for a service."

Rumors of an Apple TV subscription service date back to 2013, when reports claimed the company was going over cable companies' heads to negotiate directly with content providers. At the time, and for many months following, it was speculated that a subscription-based product would launch alongside new Apple TV hardware.

Unlike monthly offerings from cable companies, Apple is said to be working on what is referred to as a "skinny" bundle featuring live and on-demand TV from major networks and select cable channels. Subscription price estimates are up in the air, but some suggest Apple could charge anywhere from $10 to $40 a month.

Apple debuted a revamped fourth-generation Apple TV in October, complete with a new tvOS operating system and dedicated App Store, but an over-the-top streaming service was nowhere to be seen. Moonves, however, believes skinny bundles are the future.

"This will happen," Moonves said. "It has four major networks and 10 cable networks, let's say, and the price point will be in the $30s, $30 to $35, $40 maybe. People will not be spending money on channels they don't want to watch."

The concept is popular with cord-cutters and thrifty consumers, but cable companies are keen on keeping their revenue structures in place. With Apple putting a hold on negotiations, it seems the enterprise is being pushed further into the future, perhaps beyond the rumored 2016 release reported in August.

Update: Bloomberg, citing informed sources, has confirmed Apple's decision to suspend its streaming television service initiative. In lieu of a branded channel package, the company is said to be focusing on building out the tvOS App Store as a platform on which media companies can sell directly to customers.



32 Comments

suddenly newton 14 Years · 13819 comments

It's already happening with AppleTV, Roku, etc, and streaming services like HBO, Netflix, and the like. For a portion of the population, it's enough to replace cable subscriptions.

lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

This has nothing to do with Apple and everything to do with the networks and content producers. They have dipped their toes into this new market with Hulu, Netflix, etc. Service providers like cable and satellite companies will fight this tooth and nail as long as they have leverage over the networks. Does anyone think for one second that these outfits will give up their revenue streams willingly. Look how long it took the music industry to wake up. First they demanded DRM before they would sell music online. Then they fought streaming, demanding advertising or subscriptions or both.

dickprinter 16 Years · 1058 comments

I bet CBS and Moonves are two of the obstacles that necessitated the tap on the brakes.

rogifan_old 9 Years · 725 comments

Not surprising. Tim Cook telegraphed that in one of his interviews last month. The question is is it just on hold or did they decide to scrap it altogether? 

rogifan_old 9 Years · 725 comments

lkrupp said:
This has nothing to do with Apple and everything to do with the networks and content producers. They have dipped their toes into this new market with Hulu, Netflix, etc. Service providers like cable and satellite companies will fight this tooth and nail as long as they have leverage over the networks. Does anyone think for one second that these outfits will give up their revenue streams willingly. Look how long it took the music industry to wake up. First they demanded DRM before they would sell music online. Then they fought streaming, demanding advertising or subscriptions or both.

I don't really see any advantage to skinny bundles until people are able to select channels ala carte and build their own bundle. I can guarantee you some of the channels I watch most frequently would never be part of an Apple skinny bundle. but no doubt ESPN would have to be there whether you're interested in sports or not.