Roger Fingas
Apple will continue challenging a recent ruling on the use of the "iPhone" trademark in China, taking the case to the country's Supreme People's Court, the company said in a Thursday press statement.
"We intend to request a retrial with the Supreme People's Court and will continue to vigorously protect our trademark rights," the company told the South China Morning Post, quoted by CNBC.
In March the company lost an appeal with the Beijing Municipal High People's Court, at least temporarily allowing leather goods maker Xintong Tiandi to continue producing products branded under the "IPHONE" name, such as cellphone cases.
In its Thursday statement, Apple added that it was "disappointed" in the lower court ruling, and claimed it had succeeded in several past legal actions against Xintong Tiandi.
The current matter dates back to 2013, when an Apple complaint was rejected on the basis that the company couldn't prove the iPhone name was well known prior to Xintong's registration in 2007. This view was upheld in the recent appeal, with the further observation that Apple's iPhone wasn't sold in mainland China until 2009.
Trademarks and copyrights are semi-regular problems for Apple in China, perhaps the most famous incident being when Apple was forced to pay $60 million to settle a dispute over the "iPad" name.
Wesley Hilliard
Marko Zivkovic
William Gallagher
Malcolm Owen
Mike Wuerthele and Malcolm Owen
Andrew O'Hara
Amber Neely
Andrew Orr
12 Comments
"Trademarks and copyrights are REGULAR problems for ANY FOREIGN COMPANY in China". Fixed.
Best way to screw foreign companies. Chinese government behind strategy to provide cheap manufacturing, learn tech and than slowly get rid off giving trouble like slow poison. Than sell same products in countries who follow open market policy like USA.
"The Supreme People's Court."
Judge Mei-Lin Mi-Lian presiding.
So wait... They make leather cases for iPhones ...a case to put an iPhone inside of ...and the Chinese government says the case maker owns the trademark for iPhone!?!