Daniel Eran Dilger
Canonical, the software support company that maintains Ubuntu Linux, has announced it is throwing in the towel on Ubuntu phones and tablets and ending work on Unity8— a concept it had hoped would create a "convergence" experience to enable its smartphones to act as a PC or smart TV.
Mark Shuttleworth, the founder of both Ubuntu and Canonical, noted in a blog posting today that "we will end our investment in Unity8, the phone and convergence shell," reverting back to the GNOME desktop in future versions of its Ubuntu desktop Linux.
The android of Android
In 2011, after Motorola showed off its Atrix 4G phone with a dock that allowed it to connect to a display and pretend to function as a conventional PC, Canonical announced ambitious plans to eventually support phones, tablets, TVs and "smart screens everywhere" in a future version of its Ubuntu Linux distribution.
Two years later it delivered its first developer edition of "Ubuntu Touch" for phones, aimed at replacing Android on select phones— particularly Google's Nexus models.
Writing for CNET, Richard Trenholm wrote of Ubuntu Touch— after seeing it demonstrated at World Mobile Congress— that "on first impression I'm hugely taken with Ubuntu Touch.
"It's elegant, thoughtful, and versatile, while remaining beautifully straightforward. Compared to the messy Android copycats Firefox OS and Tizen, it's by far the strongest potential rival to Android, iOS, and Windows Phone. In fact, I prefer it to iOS, which long ago lost its shine, and heck, maybe even to Android, too. Fingers crossed that manufacturers and phone carriers get behind it, because I'd happily lay down my own cash for an Ubuntu Touch phone."
The next year Canonical showed off plans for Ubuntu TV at CES 2012, a project that never materialized. It appears that the company eventually hoped to have Ubuntu smartphones driving TV interfaces as an extension of its Atrix-like convergence concept.
Toward the end of 2013, Ubuntu attempted to raise $32 million in funding on crowdsourcing site Indiegogo to build an Ubuntu Edge phone (below), selling tiers of reservations that cost between $600 and $800. The phone aimed to convert into a PC when connected to an external display (above).
The project was canceled after reaching nearly $13 million in pledges. Canonical's Shuttleworth accused Apple of monopolizing the supply of sapphire screens that Ubuntu Edge expected to use.
Two years later, Spanish Android maker BQ and China's Meizu shipped the first commercial phones running Ubuntu in place of Android, albeit without attracting much interest from buyers, despite the focus on convergence.
Last year, a half decade after Canonical started work on smartphones, another enthusiastic reviewer, Jack Wallen of Tech Republic. wrote of the Meizu Pro 5 Ubuntu Edition, "many people have criticized Ubuntu Touch's laggy behavior. And while that is very much front and center on the Pro 5, I accepted that fact, simply because the platform is still in its youth."
The androids of Android androids
In 2015, Canonical's years-old convergence concept of turning a smartphone into a Linux PC— apparently inspired by Motorols'a ill-fated Atrix— was appropriated by Microsoft as "Continuum," an innovation of Windows 10 Phones that enabled them to act like a Windows PC, albeit like Ubuntu, they couldn't run actually run Windows software. Like Atrix and Ubuntu Touch, it didn't work out.
A year later, Microsoft partnered with Canonical to integrate a Linux subsystem into Windows 10 and to collaborate on cloud services.
Another year later, Samsung released its own innovation: DeX, a dock that turns its Galaxy S8 into a PC of sorts.
-m.jpg)
Chip Loder
Wesley Hilliard
William Gallagher
Marko Zivkovic
Amber Neely
Andrew Orr
17 Comments
A shame. Seemed like good tech.
Honestly, this story has nothing to do with Android. For example, the Motorola Atrix wasn't "Continuum". It just offered a charging dock with HDMI out and a USB 2.0 hub for a laptop and mouse. Lots of Android devices had mini-HDMI ports in that era before Google developed and started pushing Chromecast, and some manufacturers still include mini-HDMI ports on tablets, and more than a few Android manufacturers offered docks back then. But the Atrix, Xoom and the other devices with the USB 2.0/HDMI docks only sent the smartphone or tablet screen on the monitor or TV. In no sense did it pretend to function as a conventional PC, and if anything was better suited for video games and streaming video. It didn't offer the extra capability that Samsung's DeX does, which executes additional code to optimize the UI and compatible apps - Samsung's apps plus some from Microsoft - for a larger screen. And it certainly doesn't offer what Ubuntu achieved and Windows is still working on, which is the ability to run full-fledged desktop applications - instead of mobile apps - on a mobile device. What Ubuntu did and Windows is working on would be the equivalent of your iPad or iPhone running iOS when operating standalone and switching to macOS when docked. Granted, Samsung isn't doing that either with DeX - it would need to run Linux or at least Chrome OS when docked to be able to make that claim - but it is still a decided improvement over what Motorola and several other Android manufacturers were offering back then. (What the Motorola Atrix DID actually innovate by the way was a fingerprint scanner. Somehow DED's column failed to mention that).
So all that the columnist is trying to do here is associate Android with failure i.e. Ubuntu failed with an idea that Android tried first and also failed at and Samsung is allegedly taking another crack at when truthfully, all Samsung is doing is taking advantage of the new video out standards available in USB Type C. But Canonical's idea was not "the android of Android" or "the android of Android androids" because it had nothing to do with Android whatsoever. It was not based on anything that any Android manufacturer was attempting to do on a technology, application or OS standpoint. And it was an attempt to compete with iOS, not Android, as at the time Canonical launched their mobile ambitions, Android had like 15% market share and everyone - including this blog - was predicting its inevitable and likely imminent failure. But again, the failure of Ubuntu Touch has nothing to do with Android despite this columnist's best attempts to play association games. It is just another of many in the mobile OS graveyard, joining Sailfish, Symbian, Blackberry, webOS, Firefox OS, Java Mobile, Windows CE, Windows RT, Windows Mobile, Bada, Tizen and others still more obscure.