Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Outgoing Apple iPhone GPU designer Imagination seeks sale of entire company to parties unknown

Just over two months after Apple told it that it would no longer be using Imagination Technologies GPU offerings, the company is seeking to sell itself off, either in chunks or as a larger whole.

The Imagination Technologies board of directors declared in a statement on Tuesday that it has "received interest from a number of parties" in purchasing the entire company, and has started a formal sale process. The company noted in April that it was selling off its MIPS and Ensigma businesses, in an effort to concentrate on its new PowerVR Furian architecture.

As part of the announcement, the board has declared that it will not be publicly identifying bidders for the company. It also made clear that there was no guarantee that any offer would be formally made, nor are there any obligation to accept any offer.

Imagination is the creator of mobile graphics processing architectures, most notably its PowerVR architecture, which is used in a number of smartphones, tablets, and other compact devices. Apple uses the company's architecture in many of its products, including iPhones, iPads, the Apple TV, Apple Watch, and iPods.

Apple's declaration in April that it would stop using Imagination's intellectual property within two years means a significant reduction in revenue for Imagination, as it will not be eligible for royalty payments under the current license and royalty agreement. Apple's license fees and royalties represented revenue of $75.8 million for the 2015-2016 financial year, and rose to approximately $81 million for the fiscal year that ended on April 2017.

The UK firm's shares plunged in value by more than 60 percent in the immediate wake of the announcement, and 70 percent to date.

Apple was said to be in talks to acquire Imagination early last year, though ultimately no such deal was made. Apple has asserted that it has been "working on a separate, independent graphics design in order to control its products."

Apple has also taken time to poach a number of Imagination's staff over the last two years, including GPU architects and designers. These employees could help Apple to produce its own graphics architecture, potentially saving it from having to pay royalty fees to other companies to license any GPU technology.

Imagination also implies in Thursday's statement there could be a legal fight in the future over the in-house graphics architecture move. The company has declared in the past that Apple has not presented any evidence to substantiate its assertion that it will no longer require Imagination's technology, without violating Imagination's patents, intellectual property, and confidential information.

While evidence has been requested by Imagination, Apple has declined to provide any to the company, and has reportedly not accepted overtures from Imagination for potential alternative commercial arrangements.



15 Comments

lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

Didn’t they start out saying they would take Apple down because of their patents?

anton zuykov 9 Years · 1056 comments

Imagination also implies in Thursday's statement there could be a legal fight in the future over the in-house graphics architecture move. The company has declared in the past that Apple has not presented any evidence to substantiate its assertion that it will no longer require Imagination's technology.

Wow... Imagination, you should never go full retard. Apple does not have to prove to you anything. The burden of proving that they stole your tech relies on...yep...YOU, by providing relevant data and facts.
You are not some sort of a highest authority to demand another company to lay down all of their IP, just so you could have a look at it in order to get new ideas, since you ran out of your own...supposedly to verify that they didn't steal anything.
What a joke...

"Apple has declined to provide any to the company, and has reportedly not accepted overtures from Imagination for potential alternative commercial arrangements".
Yeah...those guys got really desperate for "potential alternative commercial arrangements".

Marvin 18 Years · 15355 comments

lkrupp said:
Didn’t they start out saying they would take Apple down because of their patents?

Likely out of desperation, knowing how much their business depended on them. Their earnings are here:

https://www.imgtec.com/investors/reports/
http://cdn2.imgtec.com/AnnualReports/IMG_Annual-Report_2016.pdf

2016: £141m revenue, £25m loss, £33m debt.

"There are no parties with whom the Group has contractual or other arrangements which are essential to the business of the Group except the contract with Apple Inc.

PowerVR and MIPS make profits after taking into account direct engineering costs, PowerVR makes profits after allocating central overheads, MIPS did not. The other 4 units (Ensigma, IMGworks, Pure and IMG Systems) make substantial losses before any central costs are allocated."

They shipped 456m PowerVR units in the 12 months before April 2016. Apple ships ~250m iOS devices every year so they were likely responsible for more than half their revenue and likely their most profitable customer, hence the massive drop in stock price on announcing they weren't using them any more.

They may have patents but what would they pay the legal team with?

PowerVR has done a lot to help Apple's products get where they are, the sustained graphics performance has really set them apart from their competition and they've been a partner with Apple for a decade now. It would be best if Apple could buy them out rather than have their IP going to a competitor. Market cap is ~£400m ($500m).

[Deleted User] 11 Years · 0 comments

Marvin said:
lkrupp said:
Didn’t they start out saying they would take Apple down because of their patents?
It would be best if Apple could buy them out rather than have their IP going to a competitor. Market cap is ~£400m ($500m).

If Apple does not need their IP (as is suggested), then it would be money wasted. $500m is a hefty price to pay to simply stop a competitor having supposedly inferior and old IP which they already probably have access to via licensing.

larryjw 9 Years · 1036 comments

Imagination no longer does anything; they are merely a collection company for IP. No value added.

Maybe Apple already has a shell company that will buy Imagination for a song and cigarette.