Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Spotify may be preparing HomePod competitor with entrance into hardware market

Spotify co-founder and CEO Daniel Ek. | Source: Spotify

Spotify could be gearing up to take on Apple's HomePod with its own competing smart speaker or other hardware, after new job advertisements for the music streaming service reveal it is looking for employees to set up the manufacturing process for its first physical products.

Three notices on Spotify's own recruitment website, found by Musically, relate to hardware production fields at various levels. The "Senior Project Manager, Hardware Production" and "Project Manager, Hardware Production & Engineering" roles details jobs overseeing the project that will help in the "creation of innovative Spotify experiences via connected hardware."

A third listing, "Operations Manager, Hardware Product," is more direct in advising of the firm's goal, stating "Spotify is on its way to creating its first physical products and setting up an operational organization for manufacturing, supply chain, sales, and marketing."

The advertising for new employees in those positions do indicate that Spotify wants to start manufacturing hardware, but that it still early in the overall process. References to working with third-party designers, contractors, and manufacturers, as well as one job's role including managing inventory and the supply chain, strongly points to this being a production effort that would use an assembly partner, such as Foxconn, instead of setting up its own production lines.

It is worth noting that the existence of the job postings are not a sign that Spotify will commence manufacturing efforts in the near future. Such roles could be filled long in advance, giving the company an opportunity to plan out the process long before it commits to manufacturing.

Currently, Spotify does not provide any hardware of its own, instead relying on working with other hardware producers to make Spotify work with third-party devices. This does leave Spotify vulnerable in cases where hardware producers decline to work with the company and makes it difficult to use the streaming music service with its hardware, such as with Apple's HomePod not including native Spotify support, forcing it to be used through AirPlay.

Developing its own hardware would enable Spotify to have control over how the end user experiences the service, as well as what other streaming competitors would be allowed to use the device.

So far, it is unclear exactly what kind of products Spotify intends to produce, but given its audio-centric nature, it is likely to be some form of smart speaker, similar to the HomePod and Amazon's Echo range. The latest job ads do not indicate the product category, but The Guardian reports other postings from April last year state Spotify wants to create "a category defining product akin to Pebble Watch, Amazon Echo, and Snap Spectacles."

Other job ads at that time for a "Product Manager, Voice" and "Director of Product, Natural Language Understanding" were detailed as working to make Spotify work more efficiently with voice-based systems, such as in cars or with third-party apps. Considering the more recent hardware-related postings, it is entirely possible these earlier postings could have been part of an effort by Spotify to start working on its own smart speaker or similar products.

Currently, Spotify is the most popular music streaming service in the world, with upwards of 70 million paid Premium subscribers, and possibly as many free listeners, but it is facing fierce competition from Apple Music in the United States. It is reported Apple Music is increasing its subscriber count by 5 percent per month compared to Spotify's 2 percent monthly growth rate, which could lead to Apple Music overtaking Spotify in terms of subscribers in the U.S by the summer.



28 Comments

macinscott 14 Years · 48 comments

Big mistake by Spotify that will only quicken their demise. They do not have the in-house talent nor the deep pockets to compete with the other tech companies in this space.

maestro64 19 Years · 5029 comments

This will not end well. They better off finding an existing product and slapping their name on it, since we know they will give it away with a subscription.

macxpress 16 Years · 5913 comments

This is an area they don't need to go in. They need to focus on their music service, not a speaker. Spotify is in no position to develop and sell a speaker, or any piece of hardware for that matter. Let others do the speaker and you focus on making Spotify the best service out there. There is nothing to gain by Spotify doing this. 

How are they gonna market this? How are they gonna sell it? Who is going to support issues? What will they do to make me want to buy this over HomePod or Sonos? This is just stupid IMO. 

dws-2 22 Years · 277 comments

I get why they're doing this (or might be doing this, really). If their biggest competitor has a smart speaker that doesn't work with their service, it could cut them out of the market.

However, I agree with the others here. It's very unlikely they're going to make a better speaker than a Sonos or a HomePod, and it's more likely they'll associate themselves with a crappy brand because of the poor speaker.

What they should be doing, if possible, is to with speaker companies like Sonos to better integrate their services so that you can get the equivalent of a "native" Spotify experience using a Sonos (or Google Home or Amazon Echo). Sonos in particular derives a lot of its value by being flexible, so I would expect they'd be open to this.

macxpress 16 Years · 5913 comments

dws-2 said:
I get why they're doing this (or might be doing this, really). If their biggest competitor has a smart speaker that doesn't work with their service, it could cut them out of the market.

However, I agree with the others here. It's very unlikely they're going to make a better speaker than a Sonos or a HomePod, and it's more likely they'll associate themselves with a crappy brand because of the poor speaker.

What they should be doing, if possible, is to with speaker companies like Sonos to better integrate their services so that you can get the equivalent of a "native" Spotify experience using a Sonos (or Google Home or Amazon Echo). Sonos in particular derives a lot of its value by being flexible, so I would expect they'd be open to this.

As soon as Apple adds in full Spotify support for HomePod this is pretty much immediately a dead product. I have no doubts Apple will eventually add in Spotify support. It may not be today or 3 months from now...but I bet it will come. As with most brand new Apple products, its nice to start, short on features, but gets better over time. I have no doubts that HomePod will be any different. Siri will get better, it will have more services support, and have new and improved features. 

This is a company panicking instead of focusing on what should be more important to them, which is making their service the best it can be. They're obviously feeling the heat from Apple where as before they were dismissing that Apple was even a threat to them.