Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

AT&T plans $15 monthly 'skinny bundle' TV streaming service, free to its wireless subscribers

Last updated

In another salvo in the battle for the nation's cord cutters, AT&T will launch AT&T Watch soon, one of the least expensive bundles available that will directly compete with its own DirecTV Now service.

The new "AT&T Watch" service, was announced in an unconventional manner, according to the Wall Street Journal: AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson described it on the witness stand, while testifying Thursday in the antitrust case involving the company's pending $85 billion acquisition of Time Warner.

AT&T Watch will cost $15 per month, and will launch in the coming weeks. It's not clear what will be offered as part of the bundle, but it will not include sports channels, and will also be free for AT&T Wireless subscribers.

AT&T has not as of yet issued a press release for the launch; all that's known is from media accounts of Stephenson's testimony.

The Competition

The new AT&T Watch service will have many competitors, among them another owned by AT&T: DirecTV Now, which launched in 2016 and offers tiers that start at $35 per month. Current incentives, such as a free Apple TV 4K with three months of prepaid service, make the plans even more attractive, however.

Other skinny bundles include Dish Network's Sling TV. Apple had reportedly planned a skinny bundle streaming service in 2015, but talks fell apart that year and it never launched. Amazon planned and abandoned a similar push two years later.

It's unclear what the status is of any Apple streaming service plans, although Apple's video plans for the near future appear to be focused on creation of original content versus streaming content produced by other studios.

Whether the launch of AT&T Watch is an earnest business move, or merely a ploy to appease the court and regulators to ensure that the merger goes through, is unclear. The Justice Department has sued to block the merger.



18 Comments

ihatescreennames 19 Years · 1977 comments

I wonder how long It will take to become a discounted pay service for wireless customers. And then a less-discounted pay service and so on. 

wood1208 10 Years · 2938 comments

Good new for AT&T wireless subscribers and probably others at $15 price. Important thing is which channels such package carries and simply being AT&T wireless subscribers, can I stream them over Wifi(limited Data is beech) on my phone ? Why not AT&T offers same $15 package as part of there DirectTV Now ? As a side note, due to cable-cutter's, Cable TV providers like Spectrum have started Ala-carte Streaming package, choose your channels(10 channels for $21) from a larger list.

Mike Wuerthele 8 Years · 6906 comments

wood1208 said:
Good new for AT&T wireless subscribers and probably others at $15 price. Important thing is which channels such package carries and can I stream them over Wifi on my phone ?

All good questions, yet to be formally announced.

lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

In my personal experience cord cutting is difficult because of the local channel issues. I have an amplified attic antenna but reception is squirrelly at times and we don’t get our local PBS station at all. My line of site to the direction of the broadcast antennas includes my town’s massive steel water tower. As far as I know none of the streaming bundles out there include local channels. Please correct me if I’m wrong. I am an AT&T wireless subscriber so the free bundle is welcome news.

lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

I wonder how long It will take to become a discounted pay service for wireless customers. And then a less-discounted pay service and so on. 

For every AT&T hater there’s a corresponding Verizon hater, T-Mobile hater, Sprint hater, Cricket hater, Cox hater, Spectrum hater, Time Warner hater, et al haters. So what’s your point and why do you think companies are not allowed to make a profit for the services they provide?