Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Here's how Apple protects your privacy in Safari with Intelligent Tracking Protection 2.0

Last updated

Apple released a new Safari Tech Preview on Wednesday, and it includes the Intelligent Tracking Protection 2.0 that was promised at WWDC. AppleInsider looks at what Apple is doing to ensure your protection and privacy as you go about your business on the web.

The new version of Intelligent Tracking Protection kills the old 24-hour window that Safari used to keep tracking cookies from sites you visit. Instead, a website can request tracking privileges, but the user has to specifically opt in.

If the user allows the cookie, it is deleted after the user stops visiting the site after 30 days of Safari use. If you go on vacation and don't use Safari at all, those days aren't counted.

Users can also opt in to permanent tracking, without a 30-day cookie purge. For example, if you subscribe to YouTube Music, the cookies won't be purged — assuming you stay logged into the service and keep using it by actively clicking on a link, using the service, or making an entry in a form on the site.

The timeline of the new Intelligent Tracking Protection

The new Safari also isn't fooled by a "first party bounce tracker" across multiple browser redirects. The quick redirects won't be allowed to deposit cookies at all, and Safari won't log them as having user interaction, nor will it reset any day counter.

Widgets or embeds in a website have independent tracking of the site visited. For example, if you watched one of our videos embedded in the corresponding article on AppleInsider, you'd have to grant YouTube permission to deposit a tracking cookie independently if you haven't already.

As a result of all this, "federated logins" from social media sites will be less able, or prevented entirely, from tracking a user across the web. With the new Safari, the user can only be identified and request tracking authorization when the user actually interacts with the social media content, like writing a comment or playing a video.

So, if you've shopped on Amazon for something, you'll only see related ads if you've granted FaceBook the permission to do so in Safari explicitly.

And, if you have regrets after granting one website or another tracking access, the new Safari will retract all granted permissions when the user clears Safari history.

Intelligent Tracking Protection 2.0 debuted on stage at WWDC earlier in June, and didn't roll out to Safari Tech Preview testers until Wednesday. It will come to all users on macOS Mojave and iOS 12 in the fall on all devices that support the new operating systems.



21 Comments

gatorguy 24627 comments · 13 Years

Curious if ISP's can still continue tracking your web activity if Intelligent Tracking 2.0 is in use? To be honest the whole thing with VPN's, private browsing, incognito etc is confusing and I'm sure I'm not the only one. 

Mike Wuerthele 6906 comments · 8 Years

gatorguy said:
Curious if ISP's can still continue tracking your web activity if Intelligent Tracking 2.0 is in use? To be honest the whole thing with VPN's, private browsing, incognito etc is confusing and I'm sure I'm not the only one. 

By IP address, sure. Can't do a ton about that. But if they're tossing cookies on your machine, they'll have to ask permission.

We'll be talking more about VPNs, private browsing, and incognito mode very soon.

tallest skil 43086 comments · 14 Years

Why can’t Apple offer us a cookie whitelist? I only want cookies from the sites from which I want them. All others can and should be totally blocked. Or at the very least, cookie locking, where I can lock cookies I want to protect from deletion so that I can one-click delete all of the others instead of having to manually pick them (or far more likely, just ignore the thousands of third party cookies that outright bypass my “disallow third party cookies” setting).

maltz 506 comments · 13 Years

Why can’t Apple offer us a cookie whitelist? I only want cookies from the sites from which I want them. All others can and should be totally blocked. Or at the very least, cookie locking, where I can lock cookies I want to protect from deletion so that I can one-click delete all of the others instead of having to manually pick them (or far more likely, just ignore the thousands of third party cookies that outright bypass my “disallow third party cookies” setting).

Chrome and Firefox offer exactly that, and have for years - Firefox, anyway. Block all cookies, unless they're on the exception list. Chrome is supposedly even better, allowing cookies, so sites that require them aren't broken, but deleting them all when you close Chrome (save the ones on the exception list) but I've had trouble getting it to actually delete. My theory is that it's actually a timeout, and I visit the site often enough it doesn't timeout. Just a guess, though. Anyway, as privacy-focused as Apple is, I've always been baffled that Safari doesn't have something like that.

Folio 698 comments · 7 Years

gatorguy said:
Curious if ISP's can still continue tracking your web activity if Intelligent Tracking 2.0 is in use? To be honest the whole thing with VPN's, private browsing, incognito etc is confusing and I'm sure I'm not the only one. 

Ditto. I was out of town, surfing via hotspot on T-Mobile and suddenly got a text message on my iPhone X from some local realtor who I'd never before contacted. Very bizarre. Luckily it hasn't happened since. Not that I do anything nefarious, but I always make a habit of using incognito.