Roger Fingas
An official spec sheet shows that despite what was claimed in a third-party teardown this week, the Series 4 has slightly reduced battery capacity versus the Series 3, even if it doesn't appear to affect running time.
The battery cell in the 44mm Series 4 is rated at 1.12 watt-hours against the 42mm Series 3's 1.34, the sheet indicates. Similarly, the 40mm Series 4 has just 0.86 watt-hours versus the 38mm Series 3's 1.07.
Apple nevertheless markets the Series 4 as achieving the same 18-hour battery life as before. That's presumably because of improved power consumption, for instance through the adoption of LTPO (low-temperature polycrystalline oxide) for its display.
The sheet was highlighted by MacRumors earlier today.
Better battery life is still one of the more common demands for the Apple Watch. Models can sometimes last two days or more with light use, but only a day or less when people take advantage of power-hungry features like workout tracking or cellular phone calls. Rival smartwatches, like those from Fitbit can run for three or four days, even with the inclusion of additional features like sleep tracking.
Malcolm Owen
William Gallagher
Andrew O'Hara
Sponsored Content
Charles Martin
19 Comments
Because... Apple.
My AWS3 gets on average 2-3 days. Two days with a workout included and at least 20% of power left at the end of day two. Three days I’m ending with battery at 1% by 12 midnight.
So so my take on this is that Apple was able to see that their watches were getting much better times than the 18hrs they apexes for. So I look at this that Apple saves space by using a smaller battery but by still saying they get 18hr plus is probably correct but won’t get the 2-3 days I get now.
i pre ordered a S4 so will find it when I get it.
Agree, the watch is thinner now - a feature that has been praised and after by more people than that of battery life, Since everyone pretty much charge their phone nightly it's not an immediate concern at the moment.