Malcolm Owen
Apple has restarted production of last year's iPhone X, according to one of the nation's most prominent financial publications, which claims the company is doing so out of international demand and a questionable obligation to fill a sales quota with OLED supplier and smartphone rival Samsung.
The iPhone X was removed from sale in Apple Stores around the world following the introduction of the iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max, with an expectation that consumers would want to acquire the more recent product launches. For models that are effectively entirely replaced by a newer version, production for older variants typically reduce down to match the lower levels of demand, or cease entirely.
According to sources of the Wall Street Journal, Apple has resumed production of the iPhone X. While it is unclear exactly why production has recommenced, a person familiar with Apple's sales and production tactics advised the report that Apple does produce legacy models for select markets where there is enough demand.
The production is a way to fuel sales and increase margins, the sources advise, with components for the iPhones typically costing less to produce or acquire, and with manufacturing equipment depreciated in value to make production viable again.
An example of this is Apple's production with Wistron in India, where the manufacturing partner is producing the iPhone 6s in the country alongside the iPhone SE. In June, it was estimated the iPhone 6 series accounts for a third of iPhone sales in India.
The report also suggests the resumption of iPhone X production is in part caused by Apple's contract with Samsung SDI for the production of OLED panels used in the iPhone X, iPhone XS, and iPhone XS Max. Apple is supposedly required by contract to buy a minimum amount of OLED panels from Samsung, and due to alleged cuts in the iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max production, Apple has turned to the iPhone X to use up the remainder of the supply.
This claim is dubious for a few reasons, with a key element being the improbability that Apple would not protect itself from such minimum orders to such a level it would require the manufacturing of older hardware. Considering the price of the iPhone XS at launch mirrored the cost of the iPhone X, as well as the considerable similarity of the two models, it seems even more unlikely that consumers would elect for an iPhone X over an iPhone XS or iPhone XR.
The talk of new iPhone X production is part of a report claiming Apple is cutting the price of the iPhone XR in Japan to boost its sales, with carriers in the country apparently set to start reducing the cost of the handsets from early next week.
Carrier officials believe it is rare for Apple to perform a price cut on a recently-released device in the market, though it has done so before. "A price cut within a month of release is rare not just for Apple but for smartphone makers in general," one senior official advised.
Japanese consumers are said to claim the iPhone XR's price is too high for the sacrifices it makes in display quality, cameras, and slower transmission speed. The iPhone 8, a 2017 release, is reportedly still popular in the country for those looking for an affordable iPhone, as it is both cheaper than the iPhone XR and was available at the time of the iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max launches.
-m.jpg)
Charles Martin
Christine McKee
Wesley Hilliard
Andrew Orr
William Gallagher
Sponsored Content
60 Comments
I thought I remembered reading here in some AI story that the reason the X was discontinued in the first place was the higher production costs compared to the XS and XR.
Only reason I think of is $100 price difference for consumers and for Apple lower cost of production due to possible reasons explained in article. Bottom line $ savings on both sides.
Apple just enhances the mid-range, alongside the 8 series. Wise move.
A12 Bionic for high-end: XR, XS, XS Max.
A11 Bionic for mid-range: 8, 8 Plus, X.
A10 Fusion for low-end: 7, 7 Plus.
If Apple places the X at the same slot as the XR ($749) that would be great ;-) That may require some tweaking with the storage. But there is an "empty" slot between the XR (749) and the XS (999), most probably the X will go there: 799-849. If that happens then my classification above will be no longer valid and we'll understand that Apple considers all the Xx series as high-end.
I see a lot of people suggesting the XR is a failure even comparing to to the 5C. Some claim it’s the poor mans iPhone X. Funny how nobody said this when the phone was launched. Even with reviews I didn’t see anyone arguing it would be viewed as a lesser XS. In fact many argued it would be the best selling model because it had the best battery life, came in colors, was cheaper and the XS looked the same as the X with only incremental improvements. Now it’s the 5C all over again? Give me a break.