Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Roku CEO says Apple TV+ needs to be on rival platforms for growth & success

Apple TV 4K

Last updated

Apple has to push its Apple TV+ service onto platforms outside of its ecosystem in order to gain a large-enough audience to be worthwhile, comments by Roku CEO Anthony Wood suggests, with the decision to offer an app for smart TVs and rival streaming platforms a way for Apple to work around the Apple TV set-top box's small market share.

On Monday, Apple revealed it would be introducing a new Apple TV experience, as well as its Apple TV+ original content service, among other Services-related announcements. In an unusual move, Apple confirmed it would be making the app available on hardware by third-party producers, including Samsung smart televisions and set-top boxes from Roku and Amazon.

In an interview with CNBC, Wood explained Apple's rationale behind the decision is purely due to where the audience for streaming services reside. Despite having a considerable user base equipped with mobile devices, the same cannot be said for the Apple TV.

"Obviously, they're counting on jump-starting [the streaming service] with all of their iPhone and iPad and Mac customers, but actually smart TVs are the way that most streaming services, long-form streaming services are viewed by customers," Wood advised. "That's where they spend most of their hours, and so for any kind of service like that to be successful you want to be on the leading streaming TV platforms."

The Apple TV has not fared well in the streaming media market, with one early 2018 report by Parks Associates putting the Apple TV at having a 15-percent share of the market. By comparison, Roku had a 37-percent share.

The relatively low market penetration of the Apple TV at one point reportedly prompted Apple to internally discuss the possibility of creating an additional streaming option alongside the Apple TV and Apple TV 4K. It was alleged a streaming stick similar to those offered by Amazon was under consideration as a low-cost alternative, though that has so far yet to make it to market.

Evidently, making the app available on competing platforms may have been an easier to perform feat for Apple.

Starting in the spring, Samsung's smart TVs will be the first to have the new Apple TV app, followed by televisions from LG, Sony, and Vizio. At around the same time, Apple will bring the app to Roku's set-top box and device line, as well as Amazon's Fire TV range.

In the interview, Wood declined to offer a suggestion as to whether or not Apple would succeed in its streaming endeavor in an highly-competitive market, but did point out the additional content of Apple and rivals like Netflix and Amazon Prime is making it "the golden age of TV," one that could "accelerate the switch to streaming" from traditional distribution via cable and satellite.



16 Comments

smaffei 11 Years · 237 comments

And, probably, the reason Apple has not lowered the price of Apple TV (or made a cheaper Apple TV device) is because it promised Roku that it wouldn't "price compete" in order to get help with getting the TV app on Roku devices.

slurpy 15 Years · 5390 comments

Thanks Roku. Apple is in really need of your advice. Clearly, they have no idea what they're doing, and never did. 

auxio 19 Years · 2766 comments

smaffei said:
And, probably, the reason Apple has not lowered the price of Apple TV (or made a cheaper Apple TV device) is because it promised Roku that it wouldn't "price compete" in order to get help with getting the TV app on Roku devices.

Riiiight... because Apple has no idea how to do software development, and they wouldn't be able to survive without the revenue generated from the TV app on Roku devices.</s>

The fact that Roku's CEO came out and said this clearly indicates that they need Apple more than Apple needs them.  Apple already has big TV manufacturers on board, which is a much larger market than people who buy a separate streamer box.

davgreg 9 Years · 1050 comments

I have an Apple TV 4K at home and a Roku TV in the call room at my hospital,  despite that, I find myself most often using my iPad Pro or Macintosh. Both the ATV and Roku systems are klunky- it is just easier to use YouTube TV via Chrome on the Mac and the app on iOS. The Apple video app is not worth bothering with.

To be honest, I had a better setup before Comcast encrypted everything. I had an EyeTV 500 (HD) that had an integrated guide and worked in Front Row (remember that?) and could easily watch all my content with the simple Apple Remote- all my iTunes content, all my recorded EyeTV content, live TV and my DVD library.

I have a a nice 32” UHD display on the desktop on my bedroom that functions essentially as my bedroom TV. Apple should bring back Front Row and allow 3rd party TV apps to plug into it. A desktop Mac is a natural TV given the right software.

robin huber 22 Years · 4026 comments

That would make sense if Apple were going to charge the same as the other guys. I suspect TV+ is going to be a loss leader. It’ll be bundled with something else or virtually given away. Roku has nothing else to sell. Apple has plenty, so doesn’t need to charge much out of the gate.