Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Compared: The 2019 iPod touch blows away the 2015 version in real world tests

iPod touch 6th and 7th generation look near identical

Last updated

On the surface, it looks like the iPod touch has only a slight spec bump over the sixth-generation iPod from four years ago. To see how that plays out day to day, we've pitted both against one another in this direct comparison.

Even under the closest examination, we don't see any modifications Apple has done on the outside, minus regulatory markings on the back panel. Apple has worked with the requisite regulatory agencies in the past to have those marks removed from previous devices and instead displays them digitally within the Settings app. Otherwise, these two devices look the same — down to the color of blue.

After turning them on and being sure they are both completely up to date — iOS 12.3.1 — we ran a few different tests.

iPod touch Geekbench results (6th left & 7th gen right) iPod touch Geekbench results (6th left & 7th gen right)

First, we ran Geekbench 4 which gave us scores of 1237 and 2331 on the sixth-generation and 2714 and 4706 on the seventh-generation on the single and multi-core tests respectively. That is a good gain for a processor that is two years newer, though it does seem to be underclocked, versus the same A10 in the iPhone 7.

iPod touch Antutu results (6th left & 7th gen right) iPod touch Antutu results (6th left & 7th gen right)

While we were at it, we also ran the Antutu benchmark. The previous generation pulled a 71685 combined score which is far below the 158191 that was garnered on the latest model.

Then we came to real-world tests. To do so, we opened a series of apps to see how quickly they could launch them. Each started from a clean slate with all apps closed and immediately following a reboot while plugged in. As you can see in the video the iPod touch seventh-gen quickly ran away with the lead, launching apps far faster than that of its predecessor. This is very impactful to how users actually use their iPods.

iPod touch 6th and 7th generation iPod touch 6th and 7th generation

While there has been a lot of griping regarding the inclusion of the A10 instead of the A11 or A12 processor in the iPod touch, in real-world use we are seeing great performance gains that make it a far superior device.

Where to buy

Both B&H Photo and Amazon are currently accepting preorders for the seventh-generation iPod touch in a variety of colors and storage capacities.

32GB iPod touch (2019)

128GB iPod touch (2019)

256GB iPod touch (2019)



14 Comments

blurpbleepbloop 18 Years · 202 comments

Respectfully, Andrew, no one is questioning whether or not the updated iPod Touch is a meaningful improvement from the last gen - and you know that, too.
It’s all to do with Apple’s curious choices when it comes to the components used. Many of us understand there is product segmentation to consider; but even then, it still is a bit quixotic for Apple to not include the latest Bluetooth (relatively low dollar component) and the last (as in previous) generation ARM processor.
 I’m frustrated that the minds behind this release are also responsible for delivering Apple’s next Big Thing - which makes me think I’m not going to be terribly enthused.
Hoping that WWDC brings some good news to offset this ho-hum.

Mike Wuerthele 8 Years · 6906 comments

Respectfully, Andrew, no one is questioning whether or not the updated iPod Touch is a meaningful improvement from the last gen - and you know that, too.
It’s all to do with Apple’s curious choices when it comes to the components used. Many of us understand there is product segmentation to consider; but even then, it still is a bit quixotic for Apple to not include the latest Bluetooth (relatively low dollar component) and the last (as in previous) generation ARM processor.
 I’m frustrated that the minds behind this release are also responsible for delivering Apple’s next Big Thing - which makes me think I’m not going to be terribly enthused.
Hoping that WWDC brings some good news to offset this ho-hum.

Our #1 question in email and on social media has been "is the new one a lot faster, can you compare the two."

By far. It isn't even close.

cornchip 11 Years · 1943 comments

square icon lives to see another day!

Soli 9 Years · 9981 comments

Respectfully, Andrew, no one is questioning whether or not the updated iPod Touch is a meaningful improvement from the last gen - and you know that, too.
It’s all to do with Apple’s curious choices when it comes to the components used. Many of us understand there is product segmentation to consider; but even then, it still is a bit quixotic for Apple to not include the latest Bluetooth (relatively low dollar component) and the last (as in previous) generation ARM processor.
 I’m frustrated that the minds behind this release are also responsible for delivering Apple’s next Big Thing - which makes me think I’m not going to be terribly enthused.
Hoping that WWDC brings some good news to offset this ho-hum.

This is a significant update to old iPod. If this product ended how many would even care, but you’re trying to tie this to WWDC as a harbinger of doom even though this was released before the developer’s conference? If this first announced and showcase during the keynote then you might have a case that Apple’s pipeline is limited right now. Keep in mine that   In 2016, 2017, and 2018 had no iPod Touch update. Did you think Apple’s ARM efforts were poor because the Touch wasn’t updated? I don’t.

entropys 13 Years · 4316 comments

Many of us understand there is product segmentation to consider; but even then, it still is a bit quixotic for Apple to not include the latest Bluetooth (relatively low dollar component) and the last (as in previous) generation ARM processor. I’m frustrated that the minds behind this release are also responsible for delivering Apple’s next Big Thing - which makes me think I’m not going to be terribly enthused.
While a agree with the sentiment, a don’t believe “quixotic” is quite the right label. Quixotic implies noble intent, even if ultimately a failure. I agree with the rest. Apple would have had to spend a bit of Q&A time when it inserted an updated, faster processor anyway. Why not get the comms chip an update while they were at it?  This the sort of thing that worries me too.