Andrew O'Hara
Apple has moved its entire portable line of Macs to USB-C, abolishing MagSafe. For a while, Apple's chargers have been the best option for powering these machines — until now.
Apple's chargers are some of the best out there. They are reliable, safe, and guaranteed to charge a Mac as efficiently as possible. In the world of MagSafe chargers, there was no alternative to Apple's own. After the switch to USB-C, however, it has opened up the market to third-parties.
RAVPower 61W USB-C PD ChargerMost chargers we've seen haven't been worth a second glance, but that was before gallium nitride chargers took off.
As we said in our explainer, "Gallium nitride, also referred to as GaN, is a semiconductor that can be used to produce chips for electronics, in a similar manner to silicon". The difference being that with GaN, more power can be transferred at a far higher efficiency than silicon.
Apple's 30W charger (left) VS RAVpower 61W charger (right)All of this yields smaller, faster chargers.
That's why we were thrilled to upgrade our Mac's charger with the new 61W RAVPower GaN charger. It is half the size of Apple's own 61W USB-C charger making it ideal for tight places and travel.
Our Mac is designed to be portable, and it charger should be as well.
Apple's 61W charger (left) VS RAVpower 61W charger (right)To date, this is the smallest 61W charger available and if you have a MacBook, MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro, you should undoubtedly upgrade your charger to this mighty RavPower alternative. At $45, it is also costs more than 30-percent less than Apple's as well.
If you have a 15-inch MacBook Pro, under most loads it will either not deplete the battery, or do so very very slowly. When charging, it is slightly slower than the 87W charger that comes with your Mac — obviously — but the compact size and weight makes it better suited for tucking in a pocket.
We are seeing more and more GaN chargers hit the market. Eventually there may be better alternatives, but for now, this is the best MacBook or iPad Pro charger out there. Grab one.
-m.jpg)
Charles Martin
Malcolm Owen
William Gallagher
Christine McKee
Wesley Hilliard
Andrew Orr
30 Comments
They should release a 30 watt one.
61 watts seems like overkill for my iPad Pro. I haven't yet gotten a USB-C charger for my iPad yet, but I will eventually. As a matter of fact, I don't have a USB-C anything yet.
I think they released this charger on The Verge with a good discount, but I simply don't need such power yet, only got an iPad Pro. Let's see what discount they offer on Cyber Monday!
What does this mean?
”At $45, it is also costs more than 30-percent less than Apple's as well.”
To the author:
Size and speed is nice, but safety is of prime consideration. Remember that fairly famous teardown of the original iPhone charger (from righto.com) that concluded its electrical engineering design was second to none?
I know you're enthusiastic about this new geegaw, but is there any independent check on its comparative electrical design robustness?