Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

More power with less: Apple's A13 Bionic is faster and more power efficient

Last updated

The A13 Bionic chip used in the iPhone 11, iPhone 11 Pro, and iPhone 11 Pro Max is the fastest A-series processor Apple has ever designed, but at the same time designed to use far less power. AppleInsider details some of the changes that went into the new fastest smartphone processor on the market.

Revealed on stage during Apple's iPhone 11 event, the A13 is claimed to have both the fastest CPU and fastest GPU of any smartphone or tablet, improving upon the power offered by the A12 used in the 2018 models. The 64-bit chip's CPU and GPU are said to be 20 percent faster than the variants in the A12, with a variety of elements allowing it to perform over one trillion operations per second, some relating to machine learning.

Power and machine learning

The A13 is made up of many sections, but the main three are the CPU, GPU, and the Neural Engine. The CPU consists of two performance cores and four efficiency cores, with each used depending on the workload. The GPU contains four Metal-optimized cores, while the Neural Engine contains eight more.

Also buried within the CPU region are a pair of "Machine Learning Accelerators," which are used to perform matrix multiplication, a calculation that is frequently used in machine learning. Apple says that the A13 will perform this calculation six times faster than the A12 Bionic. Its these accelerators that make the CPU reach the trillion-operations milestone.

A selection of areas Apple has improved in the A13 Bionic A selection of areas Apple has improved in the A13 Bionic

Due to load balancing of the Apple-designed Machine Learning Controller, the machine learning models can be scheduled on the CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine depending on which would offer the best performance. The controller also does this while balancing the need to stay as efficient as possible, helping reduce the amount of power used.

As the controller takes all the decision-making out of where to process machine learning models at any time away from developers, this also simplifies the process for development.

Reduced power and better iPhone battery life

At the same time as providing more processing power than the A12, the A13 Bionic also pushes to reduce the amount of energy it requires to perform the calculations in the first place. For this generation, it has helped Apple reach multiple extra hours of battery life in the iPhone 11 Pro, rather than typical improvements of an hour.

Part of the saving comes from changes in how it produces the chips in the first place. Taking advantage of chip partner TSMC's most recent commercial processes for creating 7-nanometer chips, described as an "advanced improved 2nd generation 7-nanometer transistor," Apple has tailored each transistor for performance and power.

At the same time, the work has led to Apple squeezing 8.5 billion transistors onto the A13, up from 6.9 billion used in the A12.

Aside from the transistors themselves, as well as being more selective over what is used to perform calculations, Apple has also worked on improving the architecture.

The CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine are all more powerful, but power efficient The CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine are all more powerful, but power efficient

The use of hundreds of voltage domains on the chip gives Apple more control over what power is used, and when. By only turning on sections at a time when they will be used for processing, while leaving unused areas without power, this brings down how much energy is used in a calculation considerably to just what is required.

At an even smaller level, the use of hundreds of thousands of smaller domains allow for granular control over what gets power, ensuring only the smallest amount of logic in the chip is used for a process.

The work has resulted in vast power savings. The CPU's two performance cores consume 30% less power, the four efficiency cores save 40%, the four GPU cores also save 40%, and the eight Neural Engine cores are 15% more power efficient.



46 Comments

razorpit 1793 comments · 17 Years

So I guess you can say the A13 has almost 2 billion reasons why it's better than the A12?  :D

Seriously though, this is an incredible jump in performance and power consumption in just one year's time. How far off can an ARM MacBook Air be?

22july2013 3736 comments · 11 Years

I was always under the impression that any CPU sent DC power (which I presume is defined as a 1 bit, or "power on") only to circuits that were actually intended to do anything. But I guess that's not true. Kinda stupid of chip designers to have power running through circuits when its not necessary. I guess they should have hired me decades ago, cause it's un-possible for me to be stupid.

CheeseFreeze 1339 comments · 7 Years

razorpit said:
So I guess you can say the A13 has almost 2 billion reasons why it's better than the A12?  :D

Seriously though, this is an incredible jump in performance and power consumption in just one year's time. How far off can an ARM MacBook Air be?

The hardware is already at a level it could easily power a desktop. The problem is the software. All applications and drivers need to be recompiled to ARM which is a huge logistics nightmare. Imagine having bought this fancy ARM laptop and no commercial app besides Apple’s first party software runs on it, because they need to build it for a new architecture now.... 
I think Apple is preparing for this with Project Catalyst, by creating a system that is not simply abstracting UI/UX, but doing the same for CPU/GPU architectures. If your app is developed using Catalyst, compiling for ARM would simply be a matter of recompilation and some minor adjustments, while Catalyst under the hood does the heavy lifting. A company like Adobe, who uses a lot of propriety modules and build systems, would not benefit from that, but a company who builds Pixelmator Pro for example would have an relative easy job.

StrangeDays 12980 comments · 8 Years

But but but Apple didn't innovate anything, because the shell of the phone still looks the same! They're lazy! /s

melgross 33622 comments · 20 Years

It’s interesting that Apple chose to save a greater percentage of power than they did to increase performance. It’s a choice. Next year they may decide to go the other way.