Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Man gets four years in prison for $1.5M Apple Pay fraud

Last updated

A U.S. district judge has sentenced a 30-year-old Miami resident to over four years in federal prison for his part in a criminal enterprise that leveraged Apple Pay to make more than $1.5 million in purchases using victims' credit cards.

Daniel Butler and three accomplices obtained at least 477 credit card accounts, later linking them to Apple Pay on their iPhones, according to a statement released by the U.S. Attorney's Office on Friday.

According to a separate indictment of co-conspirator Max Johnny Wesley, filed with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in 2018, members of the group would call credit card issuers and pose legitimate card holders, enabling access to and control over the credit card accounts in question. This method was likely used to provision each card in Apple Pay.

Starting in 2015, Butler and other members of the group began to make purchases via Apple Pay, skirting the need to present a physical card to retail staff for inspection. Whether the scheme was implemented to purchase goods online is unknown.

In total, the group made over $1.5 million in fraudulent purchases, according to the announcement.

U.S. District Judge Brian J. Davis sentenced Butler to 54 months in federal prison for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and identity theft. In December 2018, Wesley was sentenced to four years in federal prison. Rachel Bishop and Laurent Pierre Louis, also implicated in the plot, are scheduled for sentencing in December.

The group's activities match closely with a string of fraudulent purchases first reported in March 2015, some two months after Butler, Wesley, Bishop and Louis began their illicit venture. At the time, reports claimed criminals were purchasing big-ticket items at Apple Stores and other retailers using fraudulent Apple Pay accounts created in part with credit card data stolen from Home Depot and Target. Credit card information was subsequently added to Apple Pay on iPhone 6 devices and used to complete purchases at NFC point of sale terminals.

Shortly after Apple Pay launched, Apple's bank partners were sent "scrambling" to quash a rash fraudulent activity stemming from overly lax cardholder verification procedures. While Apple Pay is designed for a secure user experience, Apple itself is not in charge of credit card verification, a task that falls on the shoulders of issuing banks.

When the service debuted, financial partners sent customers down two verification paths: a so-called "green path" that immediately provisioned a card without further inspection or a "yellow path" that required additional steps to verify a user's identity. Though the yellow path was intended to provide additional safeguards against fraud, a study in 2015 found it to be somewhat lenient, with banks asking for information that was relatively easy to attain.

Many issuing banks have amended their respective guidelines to default to a more stringent user verification process. For example, some issuers mandate Apple Pay customers call banking staff to answer a panel of questions before a credit or debit card is provisioned for use.



21 Comments

sflocal 17 Years · 6143 comments

I think the headline implies that there was a security flaw with ApplePay when there was not.  The credit card issues - as usual - are the ones at fault. 

This is why I will never, ever trust anything a bank can do when it comes to security no matter how much they say they do.  So long as there is a person involved somewhere in the chain, the opportunity to exploit that weakness is very real.

6 Likes · 0 Dislikes
vtvita 18 Years · 29 comments

Sflocal > Your remark is insightful. Good for you.
I appreciate it.

1 Like · 0 Dislikes
Kuyangkoh 8 Years · 838 comments

sflocal said:
I think the headline implies that there was a security flaw with ApplePay when there was not.  The credit card issues - as usual - are the ones at fault. 
This is why I will never, ever trust anything a bank can do when it comes to security no matter how much they say they do.  So long as there is a person involved somewhere in the chain, the opportunity to exploit that weakness is very real.

You are absolutely correct, say 110 percent. Thank u for your inputs 

1 Like · 0 Dislikes
cy_starkman 17 Years · 653 comments

sflocal said:
I think the headline implies that there was a security flaw with ApplePay when there was not.  The credit card issues - as usual - are the ones at fault. 
This is why I will never, ever trust anything a bank can do when it comes to security no matter how much they say they do.  So long as there is a person involved somewhere in the chain, the opportunity to exploit that weakness is very real.

banks mess it up without a human in the chain. they are still one of the few online logins that i find will demand fixed length passcodes and have fixed length account identifiers; and allow only numbers, or sometimes letters but no symbols.

they demand you sign anything physical or in branch but never check the signature. even with two to sign accounts. though this is human.

phone banking in branch, where you can simply record the tones and have full account access.

it seems like banks are actively clueless about fraud prevention or security and have been as long as i have used them.

jimh2 9 Years · 676 comments

Unfortunately the costs of fraud like this are built in to the interest charged by the banks.

1 Like · 0 Dislikes