Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Health records firm Epic, some 60 client hospitals urge against data sharing rules supported by Apple

Last updated

A report on Wednesday revealed the contents of health records giant Epic Systems' letter opposing proposed government policy that would allow patients easy access to their medical data, an initiative supported by Apple and other tech industry players.

Obtained by CNBC, the letter to Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar warns a pending initiative to push through rules on data interoperability would be "overly burdensome" on America's health system and "will endanger patient privacy."

Proposed by the HHS in 2019, the plan modifies rules governing access to health information, allowing patients to more easily obtain and share personal data.

In response, Epic CEO Judy Faulkner in January urged hospitals to speak out against the new rules as proponents of the measure voiced a counter opinion. Roughly 60 major hospitals have signed on in support of Epic's effort, the report said.

Apple, Google and Microsoft are among a cadre of companies, patient advocates and caregivers that came out in favor of the HHS rules. Late last month the three tech industry titans participated in a meeting held by the nonpartisan Carin Alliance, which seeks to modernize health records systems in the U.S. by breaking data out of first-party silos and fostering cooperative exchange between health care providers.

As it stands, patients often run into issues when attempting to obtain or share their information, as data is typically stored on physical media or protected by systems like those marketed by Epic. According to today's report, an Epic installation can cost up to $1 billion for major hospitals, a price that could increase should the HHS initiative be successful.

"While we support HHS' goal of empowering patients with their health data and reducing costs through the 21st Century Cures Act, we are concerned that ONC's Proposed Rule on interoperability will be overly burdensome on our health system and will endanger patient privacy," Epic's letter reads in part. "Specifically, the scope of regulated data, the timeline for compliance, and the significant costs and penalties will make it extraordinarily difficult for us to comply."

Epic's entreaty recommends tweaks to the proposal including additional information on the handling of health information related to family members, as well as a longer timeline for integration. The health records company wants at least 12 months to prepare and 36 months for "development of new technology required by the rule," the report said.

Along with the hospitals backing Epic's letter, a few organizations sent similar pleas to the HHS on their own accord. Not all Epic customers are in alignment on the matter, as some of the firm's largest clients failed to sign the January letter.

Apple has for years worked to break into the health industry, first with iOS apps and more recently through technologies built on wearable platforms like Apple Watch. As it pertains to health data transportability, the company in 2018 launched Health Records on iOS, enabling iPhone users to securely store and share medical data from participating healthcare providers.



45 Comments

GeorgeBMac 8 Years · 11421 comments

we are concerned that ONC's Proposed Rule on interoperability will be overly burdensome on our health system and will endanger patient privacy,"

Bull!

EPIC and the hospitals are not concerned about patient privacy or cost (When did our healthcare system ever worry about cost?)

They ARE concerned about losing control of patient data for a plethora of reasons:  Once control of the data is taken away from "The System" the patient has a lot more knowledge and control -- which can put the hospital in bad spot.  Basically, our healthcare system, particularly at the hospital level, has always been adamant on maintaining total control of what goes on -- the patient is limited to refusing care, but even that is very difficult.   In addition, the patient's data would lose a great deal of its monetary value as they would not be able to sell it themselves to companies like Google (which one major system has already done).

When thinking about why our large health care operations do something always think money and profits because that is all that they think of - just as any other corporation does.  This proposal will cost them both in money and control so they are opposed to it.   Their objections have nothing to do with protecting the patient -- that's just the shield they hide behind.

tommikele 12 Years · 599 comments

Another example of corporate greed and profiteering in health care at the expense of consumers. The effort by Epic to stop this is an even better example of how our system of money in politics sets up to sell government to those with the money. This is a massive and very expensive lobbying campaign to control the economics of health data business at the expense of us and our families. The idea that Epic has anything but their self interest as their goal is beyond laughable. It’s amazing they can say this stuff with a straight face.

darelrex 11 Years · 140 comments

Most likely, Epic simply senses a threat to their long-term domination of this business, and these hospitals are toeing the line dutifully because they're too far in bed with Epic to imagine getting out in one piece. I've had the misfortune to actually use Epic at a couple jobs, and IMNSHO, it's a real mess.

glfrost@icloud.com 7 Years · 4 comments

EPIC is a very greedy company and nearly a monopoly. The opportunity exists to “open source” all health information systems and give patients universal access. The Obama administration gave Epic near Carte Blanche to drive up IT medical information costs. They structured parts of Obama Care to favor them! It’s time to reduce healthcare costs and open up healthcare to competition.

MplsP 8 Years · 4047 comments

EPIC is a very greedy company and nearly a monopoly. The opportunity exists to “open source” all health information systems and give patients universal access. The Obama administration gave Epic near Carte Blanche to drive up IT medical information costs. They structured parts of Obama Care to favor them! It’s time to reduce healthcare costs and open up healthcare to competition.

This.

Epic is a billion dollar, privately held corporation that has a near monopoly in healthcare. (Think Microsoft Windows in the 90’s) Hospitals and healthcare systems spend millions to tens of millions per year to lease Epic Software, one component is ‘my chart.’ Once you buy in to one part of Epic, you’re committed to every part of it and any open source system would directly harm their ability to maintain a monopoly. 

Epic’s concern isn’t for patients, it’s for their bottom line.