Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple TV+'s 'Dickinson' wins Peabody 30 entertainment award

Apple's historical comedy-drama "Dickinson" has brought home a Peabody Award for the Cupertino tech giant.

The Apple TV+ original was one of 10 winners in the Peabody 30's entertainment category. This year, Peabody said that there were more than 1,300 entries from the television, podcasts and radio, and web spheres.

Notably, "Dickinson" marks the first time that Apple's premium subscription streaming service has won a Peabody Award.

Apple TV+ first launched in November 2019. Although it features a smaller slate of content than its competitors, Apple spends more on each show than rivals and focuses on prestige, award-worthy shows and films.

About eight months into its run, that strategy appears to have paid off — at least for one show. "The Morning Show" earned three Golden Globe awards, three Screen Actors Guild awards, and a Critics Choice award.



12 Comments

Xed 4 Years · 2896 comments

Huh. And I just read on another thread that Apple's nascent service was just an abject failure that they should shutdown all their services.

Do awards translate into subscribers?

Of course. Anything that advertises something as above average will increase interest. Whether that's a significant increase or a longterm interest remains to be seen. The series isn't for me, but I did watch the first episode and it was good. Other series they offer are more my speed. I especially like Home. That said, I wouldn't pay for the service if it hadn't been offered to me with my iPhone purchase but it's still a new service and since they didn't purchase a backlog of countless hours of programming (which is mostly stuff people don't want to watch) it will take longer to build than Disney+… but that's not a bad thing.

StrangeDays 8 Years · 12986 comments

Do awards translate into subscribers?

Generally, yes, the more awards an entertainment item, franchise, or brand achieves, the more interest in it. That's just common sense. It's why film festivals exist and why winners print their accolades on their cover art and product pages.

Do you have data to share that suggests DOOM for Apple, that we should all be wringing our hands over?

SpamSandwich 19 Years · 32917 comments

Xed said:
Huh. And I just read on another thread that Apple's nascent service was just an abject failure that they should shutdown all their services.

Do awards translate into subscribers?
Of course. Anything that advertises something as above average will increase interest. Whether that's a significant increase or a longterm interest remains to be seen. The series isn't for me, but I did watch the first episode and it was good. Other series they offer are more my speed. I especially like Home. That said, I wouldn't pay for the service if it hadn't been offered to me with my iPhone purchase but it's still a new service and since they didn't purchase a backlog of countless hours of programming (which is mostly stuff people don't want to watch) it will take longer to build than Disney+… but that's not a bad thing.

I’ve never made a point of going to see a single movie in my life because it was an Academy Award winner. Is my experience typical?