Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Intel Skylake chip issues reportedly tipping point in Apple's silicon switch

Credit: Intel

Last updated

A former Intel engineer claims that Apple is ditching x86 processors for Apple silicon because of the "bad quality assurance of Skylake."

At its WWDC 2020 keynote, Apple announced a massive two-year transition away from Intel processors in Mac to Apple silicon. Although Apple said the switch is more about performance and platform consolidation, at least one former Intel staffer thinks it's because of issues with Intel's chips.

Former Intel principal engineer François Piednoël said that the quality assurance of the chipmaker's Skylake architecture was "more than a problem," according to PC Gamer.

"It was abnormally bad. We were getting way too much citing for little things inside Skylake," Piednoël said. "Basically our buddies at Apple became the number one filer of problems in the architecture. And that went really, really bad."

Piednoël added that "when your customer starts finding almost as much bugs as you found yourself, you're not leading into the right place."

Apple's switch to proprietary Mac chips has been years in the making. And although it may be a bumpy road for some, Apple believes there will be tangible benefits to performance, integration and consolidation for both consumers and users.

But Piednoël maintained that quality control issues with Skylake was the "inflection point."

"This is where the Apple guys who were always contemplating to switch, they went and looked at it and said: 'Well, we've probably got to do it.' Basically the bad quality assurance of Skylake is responsible for them to actually go away from the platform," he said.

The transition to Apple silicon is expected to take two years, and Apple has taken steps to introduce emulation and virtualization software to help ease developers and consumers alike into the switch.

Intel, for its part, has promised to support Apple and its users "across several areas of business" for the next two years.



14 Comments

KITA 402 comments · 6 Years

His full video:

https://youtu.be/JImi0Vnjvfw

kpom 659 comments · 13 Years

Wasn’t Skylake the one where all the security flaws became known? The irony is that is where Intel stalled. All of the 14nm+++++ were iterations of Skylake. 

Beats 3073 comments · 4 Years

Wasn't Skylake delayed 3 years also?

p-dog 136 comments · 14 Years

kpom said:
Wasn’t Skylake the one where all the security flaws became known? The irony is that is where Intel stalled. All of the 14nm+++++ were iterations of Skylake. 

Yes. Intel, unfortunately, shat the bed.

Rayz2016 6957 comments · 8 Years

p-dog said:
kpom said:
Wasn’t Skylake the one where all the security flaws became known? The irony is that is where Intel stalled. All of the 14nm+++++ were iterations of Skylake. 
Yes. Intel, unfortunately, shat the bed.

They shat the bed, rolled up the sheet and handed it to Apple.