Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple Silicon switch could lead to lower-cost Mac lineups, analyst says

Credit: Andrew O'Hara, AppleInsiderCredit: Andrew O'Hara, AppleInsider

JP Morgan expects the first Apple Silicon Mac to drive innovation, cut material costs, and possibly lead to a more diversely priced lineup of Mac devices.

In a note to investors seen by AppleInsider, analyst Samik Chatterjee believes that the most important announcement at Apple's November 10 event will be at least one new Mac model equipped with the proprietary Apple Silicon chip.

This device will officially kick-start the two-year transition to first-party chipsets in macOS devices, Chatterjee said. The transition will ultimately allow Apple to leverage the gains it has made with its own proprietary silicon.

"With the move to in-house capabilities, Apple is looking to regain control over the pace of the technology roadmap on the processor chips, and create a common architecture across all Apple products, making it easier for developers to write and optimize applications for the product ecosystem," the analyst writes.

For consumers, Chatterjee believes that a lower bill of materials cost with a new Apple Silicon chip could lead to Mac devices with a lower price point targeting a wider market. More specifically, the analyst contends that Apple could release an SKU with a price point between that of the MacBook Pro and the MacBook Air.

The analyst estimates a standalone market opportunity of 10 to 15 million unit volume for the new Mac device, with a starting average selling price (ASP) of $1,000. That implies about a $15 billion opportunity for Apple, "which will assure multi-year growth in a lackluster PC market."

In addition to gains in compute power and efficiency, a move to proprietary Apple Silicon could also allow Apple to bump up its pace of technological innovation once it has control of the chip design roadmap. Intel, which Apple has used for 15 years, has seen delays in its roadmap in recent years.

All in all, Chatterjee believes that an internally designed chipset could lead to a reduction in BOM costs of about $75 by "engaging directly" with foundry partners like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).

That could be important to future Mac growth as Apple's ASP for the lineup tracks around $1,400, which is quite a bit higher than competitors. A less expensive Mac device could provide a "runway for growth" with an expanded lineup.

In addition to Mac announcements, JP Morgan also forecasts that Apple could release non-related products such as a new Bluetooth and Ultra Wideband "AirTags" tracking accessory.

Chatterjee is maintaining his AAPL price target of $150, based on a 2022 earnings-per-share of $4.85 and a blended price-to-earnings multiple of around 31x.



44 Comments

eriamjh 17 Years · 1772 comments

I initially thought this could occur, but I really think that Apple will hold the price points.  Maybe, we could see Apple knock $100 off the intel equivalent.  

I suspect that Apple will use the margin to increase the content of the devices, like better screens, better cameras, 5G chips, etc.   Premium prices with premium features.

red oak 13 Years · 1104 comments

The performance + battery improvements alone are enough to fundamentally change Apple's unit market share in the PC industry.    This analyst seems to be missing that fundamental point.   A lower priced SKU variant is just the icing on the cake.  

maestro64 19 Years · 5029 comments

Do you think the cost to apple would drop considering all the licensing fees they will not have to pay Intel to use their overly expensive processors. The chip costs to Apple will be a fraction of the cost of having Intel inside.

The real question, how much of this cost reduction will Apple pass forward.

elijahg 18 Years · 2842 comments

maestro64 said:
Do you think the cost to apple would drop considering all the licensing fees they will not have to pay Intel to use their overly expensive processors. The chip costs to Apple will be a fraction of the cost of having Intel inside.

The real question, how much of this cost reduction will Apple pass forward.

Huh? There are no licensing costs to using Intel CPUs, that's all included in the cost of the CPU. 

The second part of your post is more pertinent, with Cook at the helm I doubt there will be much, if any price reduction, even if Apple's costs are less. Remember unlike Jobs, Cook is all about the profit.