New York repair store owner Louis Rossmann has started a crowdfunding campaign, and is trying to collect $6 million to bring a "Right to Repair" initiative direct to the voters, and skip state legislature.
As states across the country debate consumers' right to repair their purchased devices, most recently including Nevada's legislature, a New York businessman is hoping to get this right into law. Louis Rossman runs the non-profit Repair Preservation Group Action Fund, and says that funding a direct ballot initiative will mean "people — not politicians — decide on whether [it] becomes law."
"I have been traveling and testifying at Right to Repair bill hearings for six years now," writes Rossmann on his GoFundMe page. "Sometimes, the politicians we speak to are uninterested in our cause. Sometimes they are, but cannot vote on the issue because other items come up in session that are seen as a higher priority."
"Sometimes they misinterpret the bill," he continues. "Sometimes, the consumer protection chair runs a car dealership. In other cases, they just laugh us out of the room."
According to Rossmann, a direct ballot initiative is why the car industry already has right to repair legislation. Under such an initiative, if a certain number of signatures are collected, states put the specified measure directly to a vote.
Rossmann says that it isn't just an issue of collecting enough signatures, however. "The reason we have not done a ballot initiative is because they are very expensive!" he writes.
Without detailing the costs, Rossmann says he spoke with the company that got a car industry direct ballot initiative passed in Massachusetts.
"They were very helpful and explained how & why it would cost $5,000,000 [to] $20,000,000 to have a chance at success," Rossmann said. "It is my hope that I can leverage the social media following I've amassed over the past 8 years, with a youtube channel of 1.56 million subscribers, to be able to accomplish what they accomplished in the lower range of that 5-20 million that was estimated."
The automotive ballot was organized by Brian Hickey Associates, which describes itself as "one of the most respected lobbying firms in the state of Massachusetts."
Rossmann says that "if I reach my goal or within earshot of it," he intends to have his Preservation Group Action Fund retain this company. "If I do not reach my goal, we will conduct traditional lobbying efforts to support Right to Repair bills in states that have introduced legislation," he continues.
Apple has been expanding its independent repair provider program, but executives have also reportedly been divided over the whole issue.
11 Comments
Get ready for big, thick phones with standard phillips screws all over the place, plastic clips with no glue allowed. Replaceable batteries that go flying all over the pace when the phone gets dropped, like they used to. Get ready for do-it-yourselfers to destroy their devices after opening them up and then expect Apple to replace it free. These would be the perfect devices that iFixit would design.
Time for Apple to collapse all components into SoCs, SiPs & sticks with software that only supports its set configurations.
Does Apple reserve the right to ignore botched repair attempts?
"people -- not politicians -- decide on whether [it] becomes law."
:D Politician's aren't people, but corporations are.
Right to repair is a difficult issue. I appreciate the fact that stolen hardware becomes worthless on the parts market. However forced upgrades through end of support or worst end of life is awful. I am unable to repair my own surveying equipment purchased in 2005 because Topcon doesn’t have to sell me the repair manual/guide nor parts. Some companies have bought multiple surveying instruments and could use them together to keep one or more still in operating/factory specs. Rural/remote owners of equipment have even worst because they don’t have a dealer nearby to go to for repair. Then the farm equipment that the repairman has to come to because it’s so large. We as owners of the equipment need the ability to repair. I’ve held on to my equipment (tech & surveying) as long as possible. Just makes sense if the equipment stills does the job. Also it reduces hazardous waste by holding on to it until it can no longer be repaired. Their must be a way manufacturers can allow customers to repair while discouraging thief/stolen equipment from having any value. I contributed and I hope readers will also.