Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple Music pays artists a penny per stream, double that of Spotify

Apple is writing to artists on Apple Music, saying it pays a penny per stream, and that 52% of subscription revenue goes to them via record labels.

Apple is to send a letter via its Apple Music for Artists app, telling musicians that it wants to detail just how its payments to them work. According to The Wall Street Journal, The letter is due to be sent today and comes as the UK is investigating how fair all streaming music services are to artists.

"As the discussion about streaming royalties continues, we believe it is important to share our values," Apple reportedly says in the letter seen by The Wall Street Journal. said in the letter. "We believe in paying every creator the same rate, that a play has a value, and that creators should never have to pay [for music being promoted]."

Apple's letter specifies that it pays 52% of all its subscription Apple Music revenues to the record labels. Spotify's payments are more complex, as that service includes both subscribers and an ad-supported free tier.

According to The Wall Street Journal, Spotify at times will pay approximately the same, or even slightly more, at 50% to 53%. However, on average, Spotify is paying around half of that Apple does — per stream.

Overall, Spotify pays much more than Apple because it has 155 million paid subscribers, out of a total of 345 million total active users. In comparison, Apple rarely reveals subscriber numbers, saying only that in 2019 it passed 60 million.

In early 2020, Amazon reported that its music subscription services had 55 million subscribers.

Apple's letter to artists is not the first time that the company has tried to position itself as the best service for them. In February 2021, Apple Music's global director of Music Publishing, Elena Segal told a UK streaming music inquiry that the company wants to pay musicians fairly.

"Artists should be paid for their work," she said at the time. "Creators should be paid for their work. From our standpoint, the most important thing is to have a healthy overall creative ecosystem that's sustainable into the long term."

Stay on top of all Apple news right from your HomePod. Say, "Hey, Siri, play AppleInsider," and you'll get latest AppleInsider Podcast. Or ask your HomePod mini for "AppleInsider Daily" instead and you'll hear a fast update direct from our news team. And, if you're interested in Apple-centric home automation, say "Hey, Siri, play HomeKit Insider," and you'll be listening to our newest specialized podcast in moments.



29 Comments

rob53 13 Years · 3312 comments

A penny is fair?

Assume Apple has 60M subscribers and each plays one song per day. That's $600K/day. If I understand the article, 52% of that goes to the label but who knows how much actually goes to the artist (probably pennies with the label getting the majority of it). That's $312K/day or $113,880,000/yr with only one song per day per subscriber.

I'm sure people using Apple Music would listen on average to more than one song per day (365 songs per year) and I doubt there are 60M artists on Apple Music so calculating what each artist on average would get isn't easy but I could see 1 penny adding up pretty fast for many artists but also not making any money for many artists.

chadbag 13 Years · 2029 comments

A penny is fair?

That is for each play.  That adds up quickly.  The problem is that it is paid to the labels.   As has been noted, who knows how much of that reaches the actual artist.   Labels don’t have a stellar reputation when it comes to that.  

blastdoor 15 Years · 3594 comments

A penny is fair?

 Fine, you'll get nothing and like it!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuNJq_wI1ns

blastdoor 15 Years · 3594 comments

It's such a shame that apple could not have done with TV/movies what they did with music. 

That is, access to almost ALL content at a reasonable price for users and fair payment to creators, with Apple doing a tad better than break even on the service, viewing it mostly as a means of attaching folks to the ecosystem. That would be so much better than all of these separate services.