Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

GOP lawmakers mull taxing Big Tech to subsidize broadband access

Key Republican lawmakers in the House and Senate are warming up to the idea of leveling taxes on big U.S. tech companies to fund broadband subsidy programs.

The idea to compel technology giants to pay into a pool of money to subsidized broadband access first originated with Republican FCC commissioner Brendan Carr, Axios reported Monday. Several key GOP lawmakers have expressed interest in the proposal.

Sen. Roger Wicker, a top GOP lawmaker on the Senate's Commerce Committee, said he believes Congress should explore the proposal. The office of Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, the ranking Republican on the House Energy & Commerce Committee, said that all options should be on the table. Additionally, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy called the idea "thought-provoking."

"Any conversation about building out broadband for unserved Americans should include a Big Tech user fee that corresponds to their use of that infrastructure," a spokesperson for McCarthy said. "Funding for the Universal Service Fund — which is increasingly at odds with the principle of user pays — needs to be updated and reimagined."

The Universal Service Fund is a broadband subsidy program managed by the Federal Communications Commission. All Americans pay a fee on their cellular bills that goes into the pool. However, the fee has been going up as the revenue base declines, leading some to call for a reform of the program.

FCC commissioner Carr said that Congress should force companies that benefit from broadband networks to pay into the subsidy fund. "It's just simply asking them to pay a fair share and start contributing on an equitable basis for these networks that they benefit from so tremendously," he said.

Apple would be affected because of its App Store, Facebook and Google would pay in because of internet advertising, and Amazon would be included because of its cloud services and video streaming.

The idea has seen some pushback from the technology industry. The Internet Association, a trade organization that represents Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google, characterized the idea as a punishment on large technology companies.

"We hope the FCC will take a common sense approach and not punish innovative, high-quality streaming services that are fulfilling consumer demand," said K. Dane Snowden, the Internet Association's president.

Although telecom firms have long argued that internet companies should pay for the privilege of using their networks, Carr's proposal also suggests that major telecom firms would pay into the fund.

Acting FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called the idea "intriguing," but said that the FCC doesn't have the ability to force companies to pay into the Universal Service Fund.

"We should be open to new ideas," Rosenworcel said. "But it's clear that this would require action from Congress."

Keep up with everything Apple in the weekly AppleInsider Podcast — and get a fast news update from AppleInsider Daily. Just say, "Hey, Siri," to your HomePod mini and ask for these podcasts, and our latest HomeKit Insider episode too.

If you want an ad-free main AppleInsider Podcast experience, you can support the AppleInsider podcast by subscribing for $5 per month through Apple's Podcasts app, or via Patreon if you prefer any other podcast player.



14 Comments

tdknox 13 Years · 85 comments

Why not just collect all the taxes from the billionaires that they aren't paying? It will pay for a lot more than just broadband.

tylersdad 13 Years · 310 comments

lmasanti said:
Will they continue with coal and natural gas firing power plants to pay for more solar/wind projects?

Oh, no! They are the ones that fill GOP's congressmen pockets!

The solar/wind energy companies fill the pockets of Democrats (remember Solyndra?). What's your point? 

viclauyyc 10 Years · 847 comments

tylersdad said:

The solar/wind energy companies fill the pockets of Democrats (remember Solyndra?). What's your point? 

At least the Democrat don’t support a crazy man and solar & wind won’t polluted the environment after it is build. 

lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

tdknox said:
Why not just collect all the taxes from the billionaires that they aren't paying? It will pay for a lot more than just broadband.

The billionaires are already paying the all the taxes they are legally required to pay. If they are using loopholes it’s the same politicians wanting to tax them more that created the loopholes in the first place. So enough with the ‘tax avoidance’ bullshit. If they weren’t legally avoiding those taxes then you might have a case. Getting the politicians to close the loopholes is the big problem. The politicians don’t WANT to close the loopholes because the threat to do so gives them the leverage they need to enrich themselves while in office. It’s all a scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours symbiotic relationship between the wealthy and the politicians.

jimh2 8 Years · 670 comments

Oh so easy to take other people’s money. All companies pay for access to the internet or they own the fiber and are paid for usage. Any money tech companies collect is taxed as is any money collected by the ISP’s and the owners of the infrastructure. 

Reality is that this is a tax on the consumer as no company eats new expenses. Tech companies will figure out how much it cost per user and adjust their pricing accordingly pushing the tax rigjt back on the consumer.