Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Google fined $177M by South Korea for abusing smartphone dominance

Last updated

South Korea fined Google 207.4 billion won (US$177 million) on Tuesday for leveraging its dominant power in the smartphone market to stunt development of competing operating systems.

South Korea's antitrust watchdog, the Korea Fair Trade Commission, in its decision took aim at Google's anti-fragmentation agreements, which restrict handset manufacturers like Samsung and LG from creating forks of the operating system, reports Bloomberg.

Google's bid to limit fragmentation of Android seeks to cap the number of publicly available forks by imposing punitive measures on manufacturers like restricting access to Google apps. The tactic has been the subject of other governmental inquiries, including a wider European Commission antirust investigation that resulted in a $5 billion fine in 2018.

In addition to the 207.4 billion won fine, the KFTC banned Google from forcing manufacturers to sign AFA contracts, the report said. Google must also modify existing contracts to fall in line with the ruling's stipulations.

"The Fair Trade Commission's action was not limited to mobile devices, but corrective measures included emerging smart device-related areas such as smart watches and smart TVs," KFTC Chairperson Joh Sung-wook said on Tuesday. "Therefore, we expect that new innovations will occur as some competitive pressures in this area are activated."

The body is also investigating Google's Play Store, implementation of in-app purchases and advertising business as part of three separate inquiries, the report said.

Late last month, Korea became the first country to pass legislation that extricates Apple and Google from profits earned by developers on their respective online marketplaces. The country's parliament voted to approve regulations that bar app store operators from requiring use of first-party payment systems, potentially upending a system that netted the tech giants an up to 30% commission rate on in-app purchases.



12 Comments

CheeseFreeze 7 Years · 1339 comments

And now watch the lack of outcry by Apple fanboys, because it’s Google.

entropys 13 Years · 4316 comments

Aww, Samsung sicked the regulator onto Google. Frenemies much?
How much separation between the regulator and the chaebols I wonder?

mind you, Google can’t pretend Android is open source then require Anti Fragmentation Agreements. On the other hand Android is more coherent because of those agreements.

Imagine trying to work out which  app works with which fork of android!

leehericks 9 Years · 47 comments

Fragmenting an OS is an awful idea. Google needs to open source because they are built on an os foundation but...the resulting product should be licensable no?

I think if they fork Android, they shouldn't be able to call it Android and no Google services. Seems fair enough. Google should be able to withhold unique and expensive developments from the open source version as well.

Just Samsung and government corruption.

sflocal 16 Years · 6138 comments

I'm a bit mystified by this.  Why don't they allow others to fork Windows then?

I find it odd that a government is forcing a company to make its own product (test, based on open-source) to be modified by others and used in however they want.  

I supposed if they're to do that, then Google should require that it no longer be called Android.  So odd.

verne arase 11 Years · 479 comments

Google should take Android back in-house and drop the open source fiction.

The only reason they did it in the first place was to change the business model so Apple couldn't sue them back into the stone age.

No profits from the OS? No way to sue us for the IP theft since there were no profits.