AppleInsider is supported by its audience and may earn commission as an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner on qualifying purchases. These affiliate partnerships do not influence our editorial content.
The U.S. District Court Judge presiding over a lawsuit accusing Apple of price-gouging on the App Store criticized the math of one of the case's expert witnesses.
Daniel McFadden, a Nobel prize-winning economist, prepared an analysis backing a claim that Apple's App Store requirements cost consumers billions of dollars. However, U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers didn't appear to buy that argument, Bloomberg has reported.
During questioning lawyers for the consumers in the case, Judge Gonzalez Rogers knocked McFadden's work, claiming that he provided only six paragraphs to explain his methodology and adding that he isn't "an expert in any of it."
The lawsuit alleges that Apple owes iPhone customers between $7 billion and $10 billion for charging "supra-competitive" prices for app and in-app purchases on the App Store. However, the case can only be certified as a class action representing nearly 400 million App Store users if Judge Gonzalez Rogers allows it to move forward.
At this point, it isn't clear if she will green-light the lawsuit. For example, the judge cast doubt on the way that McFadden used the Epic Games store as a benchmark for how Apple overcharges customers.
"What about the fact that it's operating at a loss for the foreseeable future?" Judge Gonzalez Rogers asked lawyers. "If you cherry pick your numbers, how is that methodology? And if I don't agree with that, doesn't the entire model fall?"
Lawyers for customers defended McFadden's work, saying that the methodology he used is "widely accepted by economists to determine and measure the effects of anticompetitive conduct on market prices" and calling the analysis "relevant, reliable, and admissible."