Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

If you thought printer cartridge DRM was bad, Dymo is forcing users to buy RFID paper

Printer manufacturer Dymo is facing backlash after it debuted new label printers that feature digital rights management embedded in their paper.

The latest Dymo label printers sport RFID readers that can authenticate the labels that customers place within the printers. According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, this allows Dymo to distinguish between first-party labels and cheaper alternatives.

Dymo touts the benefits of the chipped label paper in its sales literature, including auto-detection and remaining label counts. However, the chipping also forces Dymo customers to purchase first-party labels that are more expensive than many of their competitors.

Some label makers are already adding warnings about the lock-in, advising users that the new label printers won't work if they don't detect the chipped paper.

The move has courted controversy, and many users are already coming up with ways to bypass the paper-baseD DRM. However, third-party labels manufacturers and others may have solid legal reasons to not offer a workaround.

According to the EFF, under U.S. copyright law, rivals that distribute tools for bypassing an "access control" for a copyrighted work can be subject to up to $500,000 in fines and five years in prison. The firmware on a Dymo printer can fall under copyrighted work.

"Dymo is trying something unprecedented here," the EFF wrote. "DRM in paper is such an abysmal, abusive idea that we should all recoil from it."



18 Comments

22july2013 11 Years · 3736 comments

This reminds me of the Kodak case in 1978. Kodak lost.

bloggerblog 16 Years · 2520 comments

According to the EFF, under U.S. copyright law, rivals that distribute tools for bypassing an "access control" for a copyrighted work can be subject to up to $500,000 in fines and five years in prison. The firmware on a Dymo printer can fall under copyrighted work.
Firstly, I am not sure that law holds any water in this scenario, Apple was not able to stop Hacintosh or Cydia.
Secondly, that's why we have China and Alibaba.
Thirdly, what's a printer?

chadbag 13 Years · 2029 comments

Not sure that using a firmware falls under copyright.

I hope they (Dymo) get their wee wee slapped really hard  and they end up paying a ton of legal fees on a losing battle. 

hammeroftruth 16 Years · 1356 comments

chadbag said:
Not sure that using a firmware falls under copyright.

I hope they (Dymo) get their wee wee slapped really hard  and they end up paying a ton of legal fees on a losing battle. 

More than likely, a competitor like Zebra can use this to market their competitive products.