Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Johny Srouji says the Apple Silicon strategy challenged Apple

Last updated

Apple's transition away from Intel to Apple Silicon was a difficult gamble to undertake, with a profile of Johny Srouji revealing challenges including an internal debate over designing components, as well as the timing of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Apple's resurgence of the Mac and MacBook lineup is largely down to its creation and implementation of the M1 chip lineup, with its Apple Silicon components able to outpace its rivals. In a profile of Johny Srouji, Apple's SVP of Hardware Technologies, more light is shed on the design thinking behind the creation of Apple Silicon.

Apple had built a team up to include thousands of engineers working on the company's silicon for iPhone and iPad. Limited by the constraints of working from a battery, the team's designs also enabled deep integration with the hardware, to complete tasks that designers wanted its ranges to do.

However, a flashpoint occurred in 2017 when tech bloggers talked to executives, reports the Wall Street Journal, with Apple apologizing for shortcomings in its professional Macs. After continued complaints about low performance through using Intel chips, Apple stepped up its efforts to shift away from the chip maker.

The change prompted debate within Apple, Srouji confirmed, since computer producers don't tend to design such important components in-house. The move was considered risky, in part because the team had to design a chip architecture that would work from the cheapest Mac mini to the most expensive Mac Pro.

"First and foremost, if we do this, can we deliver better products?" said Srouji about the debate. "That's the No.1 question. It's not about the chip. Apple is not a chip company."

The team then had to work out whether it could deliver the chip, at the same time as increasing its numbers to deal with other projects and technological changes. "I don't do it once and call it a day, "Srouji adds. "It is year after year after year. That's a huge effort."

The process prompted Apple to expand its chip strategy to Macs, complete with a scalable architecture. A former engineer told the report Srouji's team had suddenly become a central point of product development, increasing Srouji's influence over time.

COVID-19 became a potential issue for Apple Silicon's development, with remote-work mandates impacting chip validation before production commenced. Rather than the usual process of having engineers view chips through microscopes in a facility, Srouji helped implement a process where cameras were used to perform the inspection remotely.

The rapid deployment was necessary to avoid any delay in production, but was quick due to the size and spread of Srouji's team. Spread around the world, the group was very familiar with working via video calls across time zones.

"What I learned in life: You think through all of the things you can control and then you have to be flexible and adaptive and strong enough to navigate when things don't go to plan," said Srouji in an interview. "COVID was one for example."

Apple is currently preparing to hold its WWDC event in June, one that could see the company introduce the next generation of its Apple Silicon strategy. Rumors have proposed Apple is working on introducing M2 chips in an updated MacBook Air and MacBook Pro later in 2022, which Apple may tease at the developer conference.



55 Comments

lkrupp 10521 comments · 19 Years

Out of all the desktop/laptop OEMs out there Apple was the only one with the balls to strike out on its own. As the article points, with tremendous risk and challenges. The rest remain locked down to whatever Intel or AMD does or does not have to offer. But since the debut of the M1 suddenly other OEMs are investigating producing their own SOCs.

One thing is certain for those of us who keep riding the Apple log flume, it’s a thrilling ride and you never know what’s around the corner, just like an Indiana Jones movie.

sandor 670 comments · 17 Years

lkrupp said:
Out of all the desktop/laptop OEMs out there Apple was the only one with the balls to strike out on its own. As the article points, with tremendous risk and challenges. The rest remain locked down to whatever Intel or AMD does or does not have to offer. But since the debut of the M1 suddenly other OEMs are investigating producing their own SOCs.

One thing is certain for those of us who keep riding the Apple log flume, it’s a thrilling ride and you never know what’s around the corner, just like an Indiana Jones movie.

I think having your own operating system is a part of this equation.

Apple languished for decades under the "control" of Motorola, IBM, Intel & others. 
Jobs coming back with NeXT & helping push the end of the "Classic" Macintosh operating system is not to be underestimated.
In the same way having a decade or so to see the 68k to PowerPC switch as well as the PowerPC to Intel switch means that Apple as a company had a handle on the intricacies of large platform switches & maintaining support for older software along the way.

hackintoisier 86 comments · 5 Years

lkrupp said:
Out of all the desktop/laptop OEMs out there Apple was the only one with the balls to strike out on its own. As the article points, with tremendous risk and challenges. The rest remain locked down to whatever Intel or AMD does or does not have to offer. But since the debut of the M1 suddenly other OEMs are investigating producing their own SOCs.

One thing is certain for those of us who keep riding the Apple log flume, it’s a thrilling ride and you never know what’s around the corner, just like an Indiana Jones movie.

Apple is unique in that its the only laptop vendor that has its own operating system. And that is the singular reason why Apple could ditch x86 and continue to be relevant. I’m sure Asus, HP and others would probably want to use another chip architecture besides x86 to diversify their portfolios.  But there’s not a merchant ARM vendor out there with high performance CPUs in terms of rivaling AMD and Intel for the client market. 


The quintessential question is if they adopted ARM or another chip architecture, what OS would they run? What productivity apps would they run? What gaming apps would they run?
A large part of the reason why Intel and AMD continue to remain dominant is because of Microsoft’s dominance, especially in enterprise. Even when NVidia and Qualcomm unleash ARM chips into the ecosystem, those chips will have to run windows (on arm) to be of any relevance. If they don’t run windows and key windows apps well, no one will want to buy them. 

So Apple definitely has to be respected for its engineering prowess in designing and brining Apple silicon to market. But apple is unique in that it controls an OS and has the power to enable apple silicon to run the apps that people need. So it’s more than just balls to move on, it’s also controlling the software stack as well, something the competition cannot do very easily. 

plymouthpatsfan 33 comments · 2 Years

every time some shift like this happens, I go back and reread stories about NeXT and Jobs' wilderness years away from Apple.  It's astonishing that he and the NeXT team followed the technology and seemingly lost every battle until he (and they) ultimately won the war.  Learning to port NeXTSTEP OS to other chip architectures in the early 90s is still paying dividends today on a scale they couldn't have possibly imagined when they were just trying to survive.  shocking success story, really.

darkvader 1146 comments · 15 Years

And it is still stupid.
Apple should have added AMD models, not used souped-up phone chips in computers.