William Gallagher
The DOJ has been granted permission to present oral arguments in the Epic Games vs Apple appeal, and is expected to repeat prior claims that Apple's victory could harm antitrust enforcement.
Representatives from the Department of Justice have previously joined 34 States in siding with Epic Games in its dispute against Apple's App Store. Now with an appeal set for October 21, the DOJ asked permission to present oral arguments.
The Department filed a request to present for 10 minutes during the appeal and this has now been granted. The DOJ's lawyers said they wanted to explain to the court details of the proper legal framework for evaluating antitrust issues.
Back in 2018, the DOJ actually supported Apple over the App Store in an amicus brief. But in 2022, it was one of many parties filing amicus briefs against Apple.
The Department has argued that there were "multiple legal errors" in how the court interpreted the Sherman Act about antitrust issues. Its lawyers maintain that upholding Apple's victory could "imperil" future antitrust enforcement.
Such future enforcement could include the antitrust case that the DOJ is separately preparing against Apple.
Wesley Hilliard
Malcolm Owen
Andrew Orr
Sponsored Content
Christine McKee
Thomas Sibilly
14 Comments
I find the Epic case to be problematic. If I were Apple I would go scorched earth because the alternative negates any platform innovation investment going forward. I would make it clear , we have spent 50 billion dollars building and maintaining our platform. It is primarily for our first party apps and services and are designed to make a profit for our shareholders. We are to make as much profit as possible just like any other company. We choose to offer an extreme amount of value to our customers with products that last 2 to 3 years beyond our competitors in many cases. We do not cans can justify continuing to support products of platforms that do not meet our profitability standards or we see potential to grow into them.
Not a Justice department's place to start taking side for one company vs other ?
Epic lost the original court case because they couldn't provide EVIDENCE that Apple had violated antitrust laws. They didn't lose due to "interpretation".
"The final trial record did not include evidence of other critical factors, such as barriers to entry and conduct decreasing output or decreasing innovation in the relevant market."
https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/09/10/epic-v-apple.pdf
Department of Justice…..there you go again.
By doing this,
People need to know the Biden Justice department is essentially working on behalf of the Chinese communists as Epic is 49 percent owned by Tencent
I voted for Biden but this is truly shameful and disgusting