Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Lufthansa flip-flops, AirTags now allowed on flights

After being incredibly clear on social media that AirTags weren't allowed on Lufthansa flights, the airline has caved and is now allowing them.

After a chaotic weekend for Lufthansa where its social media presence made it clear that Apple's AirTags weren't welcome in checked baggage, the airline seems to have reconsidered. In a Tweet, the airline made it clear that the trackers are now allowed.

It's unclear why Lufthansa said that the Luftfahrtbundesamt shares its risk assessment of AirTags. The airline was explicit over the weekend that they considered the devices unsafe for flight, despite international airline regulations being clear about the matter.

AppleInsider contacted six Lufthansa flight employees in the US who are not authorized to speak on behalf of the company while preparing this story. Three thought that the ban was still in place, two didn't know about the ban, and one didn't know what an AirTag was, or how it worked. So, it's not clear if the new guidance — or any information at all — has been promulgated completely.

Following initial reports in German media, the airline's Twitter account was asked to confirm that a ban was in place. In one tweet, the rumor is confirmed with Lufthansa "banning activated AirTags from luggage as they are classified as dangerous and need to be turned off."

Pressed further on the classification, the airline claims "According to ICAO guidelines, baggage trackers are subject to the dangerous goods regulations. Furthermore, due to their transmission function, the trackers must be deactivated during the flight if they are in checked baggage and cannot be used as a result."

The airline's claim about International Civilian Aviation Organization (ICAO) guidelines was entirely wrong. The regulation that Lufthansa is citing specifically talks about lithium ion battery regulations, such as those used in larger devices like a MacBook Pro that have more than 2 grams of lithium. An AirTag uses a battery with about 0.2 grams of lithium — far too small to be considered an issue under the guidelines.

If AirTags were banned because of lithium content, then most battery-powered watches would need to be as well.

AirTags are covered by AirTags are covered by "dangerous goods" regulations according to Lufthansa.

AppleInsider spoke with multiple international aviation experts before our report on October 9, and more since. Universally, they have told us over several days that Lufthansa's ban wasn't based on anything in the regulation. One went so far as to say that the ban was "a way to stop Lufthansa from being embarrassed by lost luggage."

AirTags have led to embarrassment for airlines and airports, such as instances where luggage got lost at an airport between flights, as well as an office full of lost luggage. It has also helped with the arrest of a baggage handler who stole thousands of dollars worth of jewelry and other items.



11 Comments

22july2013 3736 comments · 11 Years

I guess the right hand has finally figured out what the Lufthansa was doing.

wonkothesane 1738 comments · 12 Years

There was no flip-flopping. 

If you read the original information carefully, it clearly said that LH was referring to other regulations, but did not state how they as airline would interprete this. There was also a misleading tweet pouring oil into the fire. LH never at any point officially banned AirTags. Therefore, there is no flip-flopping involved. Click-bait on the other ends, maybe? 

winstoner71 117 comments · 7 Years

I read this as Lufthansa has branded slippers aka flip-flops that you can now wear on flights. 

exgeniustrainer 8 comments · 5 Years

I’m wondering if something had to become lost, or that they wanted to make sure something was not tracked? 🤔

citpeks 253 comments · 10 Years

There was no flip-flopping. 
If you read the original information carefully, it clearly said that LH was referring to other regulations, but did not state how they as airline would interprete this. There was also a misleading tweet pouring oil into the fire. LH never at any point officially banned AirTags. Therefore, there is no flip-flopping involved. Click-bait on the other ends, maybe? 

"Hi David, Lufthansa is banning activated AirTags from luggage as they are classified as dangerous and need to be turned off./Mony"

Perhaps in your mind.  The LH employee, tweeting from an official, verified company Twitter account, was clear and unambiguous.  The tweet cited above, from a different employee through the same account, doubled down on the original tweet, and offered justification for that position.

Today's tweet, coming via a different verified company account from the larger company as a whole, only reinforces that internal conflicts existed, and lines of communication, as well as responsibility, were lacking.

Mony and Ana may be polishing their CVs now, or at least were the receiving end of a stern memo from above.  Not unlike what their cabin crews deliver (note--when the pilot advises passengers to stay seated until the gate has been reached, and the seat belt sign extinguished, they mean it).

This brouhaha is entirely of Lufthansa's own making.