Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple's AR headset probably won't need an iPhone to function

A render of a potential Apple headset [AppleInsider]


Apple's highly anticipated mixed-reality headset may not require an iPhone to work, with the first release in the lineup likely to be able to work independently of any other Apple device.

Apple is thought to be preparing its initial ar headset is expected to finally surface in 2023, potentially during or before WWDC 2023. The first headset in Apple's product line that could appear at that time may be more of a standalone device than previously thought, with it apparently able to work without the user necessarily having an iPhone or iPad beforehand.

According to Mark Gurman's "Power On" newsletter for Bloomberg, the headset "probably won't require" an iPhone for setup, nor for actual use. Sources say the latest versions of the headset being tested apparently can be set up without needing an iPhone, with the headset able to download a user's content and iCloud data directly for itself.

While able to work independently of other hardware, users will still be able to transfer data to the headset from their iPhone or iPad, in a similar way to how new devices can be set up.

The idea of it being independent hardware is highly plausible, since Meta's Quest 2 is already designed to be used separately from other hardware, though you can still interact with it via a companion app.

Interacting with the headset is via eye and hand tracking, including in-air typing, but this has apparently been "finicky in testing." While users may have to rely on an iPhone's keyboard for text entry, it is expected that software updates will be deployed to provide rapid improvements after launch.

In a refinement to earlier reporting, Gurman now thinks that a WWDC launch for the headset, apparently called Reality Pro, will occur. Shipments would take place by the end of 2023, in theory.

Beyond the first headset, Gurman writes that Apple is already planning follow-up models, including a cheaper version due at the end of 2024 or into 2025. Using a lower-end display and processor, the headset tentatively titled Reality One will be much cheaper than the initial $3,000 model.

A second-generation Reality Pro is apparently on the way, which may offer considerably more performance than the M2-equipped first-gen model. An apparent complaint is that the M2-based model isn't powerful enough to support more than two realistic VR representations of participants at a time.



19 Comments

twolf2919 2 Years · 149 comments

Why is it so hard for authors to get AR vs VR correct?  All the rumors about an imminent new Apple device have been for a VR or MR/VR product, not an AR device.  Heck, even the stock photo used for this article shows goggles with opaque front - something you could not have with AR glasses/goggles.

Marvin 18 Years · 15355 comments

twolf2919 said:
Why is it so hard for authors to get AR vs VR correct?  All the rumors about an imminent new Apple device have been for a VR or MR/VR product, not an AR device.  Heck, even the stock photo used for this article shows goggles with opaque front - something you could not have with AR glasses/goggles.

There's passthrough AR that uses front-facing cameras, which captures real-time stereo video at a high FPS and merges digital content into the feed. This is how AR currently works on iPhone/iPad. This can give better quality AR because it allows better matching between the digital and real images and fully opaque digital content.

The downside is that you are always looking at a display which can cause eye fatigue more easily than looking at natural light and the real video feed doesn't look as natural as looking through lenses.

Here's passthrough AR on Meta/Oculus Quest VR headset:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/jUIE2l_9ig8

h2p 15 Years · 335 comments

“…the initial $3,000 model” isn’t priced for consumers, obviously. This could be Apple‘s way of skimming the cream off the top of people that are so interested and so excited about the mixed reality headset that they’ll pay that kind of a price. One other little tidbit is that this could be like the original iPad… Said to be priced at $2000 (by the PC press) and it was released at $499. It was a big hit immediately. 

If the “lower priced“ headset is at $1000, then this too will be an immediate hit. That would be essentially the price of the iPhone 14 Pro so I’ve got a little bit of wishful thinking going on there.

StrangeDays 8 Years · 12986 comments

Seriously don’t the $3,000 rumors. Apple is a mass market CE company, not a niche market company. Yeah yeah the gold Watch is an outlier, but I think that was a sacrifice to Ives who wanted to work on something novel and had a silver (gold) lining of generating buzz.

baconstang 10 Years · 1160 comments

Well, yeah.  It's not like a watch where there is no room for the electronics.