Apple headset must battle 'design quirks' to be a success

Personally, I see no issues with these so-called quirks if the end product does what it aims to do.

No SIM is perfectly fine if the device is focused on consumer home use. Yes, IMO, that would restrict it's scope a lot in terms of general XR use but if that is the focus, I can't see any problem. 

Likewise a tethered battery is definitely a non-issue if the alternative is adding more weight (and therefore less comfort) to wearing the device. If use time is extended as a result, then better still. There are solutions to that particular problem that are 'ready' but just haven't come to market yet. Like ceiling mounted, laser charging (which has the advantage of charging multiple devices at the same time. Of course, that would add to cost so traditional charging (hopefully ultra fast for once) would be fine. 

There will be some people, like those who claim Apple only releases products when they are fully baked, who might feel a bit conflicted by a product that possibly isn't mature enough to hit the ground and all  its goals at the outset but there is no better way to improve a product than by using it in the real world. And actual production plus sales help to bring prices down as the future generations improve. 

Until we see the checkboxes of what they aim to do, it's impossible to know how many didn't get checked, got partially checked or are checked completely. 

designr said:

AppleInsider said:

Apple's long-awaited mixed-reality headset launch on Monday will be a "risky endeavor" for the company, a leaker claims, but "design quirks" will be worked through in future revisions as the offering is refined over the coming years.

Doesn't this describe almost every product from Apple already?  :|

Yes. And also, one man's quirk is sometimes another man's design hit.

The rounded iPhone design is something I've always thought was incredibly slippery without a case. 

Yet, the squared off design was always my favourite so I prefer the current models but understand that as phones are now larger in general they are probably more uncomfortable without a case for most people. 

In terms of modern ergonomics for average hands it was probably a hard sell to get the flat sided design back. I'm still glad they did it though. 

But then, ergonomics aside, there were supposed internal design wins in terms of space.

On the other hand I've always detested the indent on the bottom casing (for screen opening) with those sharp edges on either side. I could never see the need.

The hockey puck mouse probably stands out as an example of how to get things wrong. 

Regarding nausea - 
I was in a room with a bunch of "higher ups" watching a demo of someone wearing an AR headset with what he was seeing on projector screens.  Up to about a minute in, everyone was enthusiastic about what the tech was doing: installing parts.  Then, I started looking at them... one by one they started looking away, until all of them were intentionally shadowing their faces from the screen.  One or two left the room and din't come back in until they were made aware that the projector was now showing a PowerPoint.

I asked about that, and everyone was getting nauseous, mainly because the micro-movements of our heads are well accounted for by our brains and the AR headset, but to those watching, it looked like he was on the water, but they were on land, so the movement didn't match what they were seeing.

They technician had no issues, nor did most of the people when they tried the headset on.

There is a phenomenon where the users do get seasick, claustrophobic, or have other issues when wearing AR/VR headsets, and one thing I believe can help solve this is not having cameras display on the screen, but have clear screens that project the images needed, and let the user see reality with no delay.

I do fly FPV drones, and it's a lot of fun to do that, and every 8-9 minutes I have to take the goggles off and maybe that's the eye-rest I need.

jeffythequick said:

Regarding nausea - 
I was in a room with a bunch of "higher ups" watching a demo of someone wearing an AR headset with what he was seeing on projector screens.  Up to about a minute in, everyone was enthusiastic about what the tech was doing: installing parts.  Then, I started looking at them... one by one they started looking away, until all of them were intentionally shadowing their faces from the screen.  One or two left the room and din't come back in until they were made aware that the projector was now showing a PowerPoint.

I asked about that, and everyone was getting nauseous, mainly because the micro-movements of our heads are well accounted for by our brains and the AR headset, but to those watching, it looked like he was on the water, but they were on land, so the movement didn't match what they were seeing.

They technician had no issues, nor did most of the people when they tried the headset on.

There is a phenomenon where the users do get seasick, claustrophobic, or have other issues when wearing AR/VR headsets, and one thing I believe can help solve this is not having cameras display on the screen, but have clear screens that project the images needed, and let the user see reality with no delay.

I do fly FPV drones, and it's a lot of fun to do that, and every 8-9 minutes I have to take the goggles off and maybe that's the eye-rest I need.

Seasickness is caused by when the visual information from the eyes received by the brain doesn’t match what the inner ear senses.

Dear God it’s a headset, not a cure for cancer, or Alzheimer’s cure. FFS, what does this thing do for humanity except represent another money pit for Apple. Having first world worries about something that really benefits no one must be nice.