Xcode's power keeps Mac relevant in Apple's ecosystem

The Mac continues to enjoy strong consumer demand and serves a crucial purpose in supporting the functionality of the iPhone and the upcoming Vision Pro headset.

At the recent WWDC keynote, Apple unveiled the Vision Pro mixed-reality headset and updates to the Mac lineup. New machines include an upgraded Mac Studio, Apple Silicon Mac Pro, and a 15-inch MacBook Air.

While Mac sales may lag behind mobile products like the iPhone, they still hold significant importance within Apple's ecosystem, according to the newest report from Consumer Intelligence Research Partners (CIRP).

Mac laptops are the most popular, representing over 75% of Mac computer sales in the most recent twelve months. Within the laptop category, the MacBook Pro models, both high-priced and high-powered, make up over half of the laptop sales and over 40% of all Mac computer sales.

On the other hand, the MacBook Air models, known for their more affordable price range, contribute nearly one-third of the total Mac sales, while the remaining 46% of laptop units fall into this category.

Within the desktop category, the iMac holds a modest yet significant 10% share of total sales and approximately half of all desktop sales. In contrast, the high-end Mac Pro represents almost half of the Mac desktop sales and 9% of all Macs.

Popularity of Mac models in the last twelve months

But despite the power of the Mac Studio and the low price point of the Mac mini, these two models represent a tiny fraction of Mac sales at 1% and 3%, respectively.

In general, while Apple is often perceived as a mobile technology company due to the immense popularity of the iPhone, the Mac still holds substantial importance within its ecosystem. And there's a good reason for that.

While Apple's mobile products may be more popular, they rely on the power of the Mac through Xcode. Xcode is a development environment for macOS that lets developers create apps for Apple's operating systems.

Xcode is a crucial and powerful tool not found on mobile devices. While developers can use Swift Playgrounds on the iPad to create apps and submit them to the App Store, it lacks the extensive capabilities of Xcode, such as debugging, version control, and support for external libraries.

"Development for visionOS starts with Xcode, which includes the visionOS SDK," Apple says on its webpage. As a result, neither the iPhone nor Vision Pro threaten the Mac — for now.

Latest Exclusives

Latest comparisons

14 Comments

fishwhisperer 17 comments · 9 Years

About 1 year ago

I find it hard to believe that the Mac Pro outsells the Mac Mini and Mac Studio, though the article is not clear i they are counting dollars or units. Anyway, how would;d they know? I don't trust this "guesstimates" when it comes to Apple because of the tight control of Apple on their sales channels.

godofbiscuits 249 comments · 10 Years

I call BS. I'm a developer. There are far less than 10M Apple developer accounts total, while there are between 1 and 2 BILLION iPhones in use. It's not Xcode that keeps the Mac relevant. It's that computers are still relevant, and that laptops are the most popular/useful form factor, and that Apple's are the most versatile and well made.

twolf2919 144 comments · 2 Years

fishwhisperer said:

I find it hard to believe that the Mac Pro outsells the Mac Mini and Mac Studio, though the article is not clear i they are counting dollars or units. Anyway, how would;d they know? I don't trust this "guesstimates" when it comes to Apple because of the tight control of Apple on their sales channels.

This is probably just an artifact of Mac Studio's relative newcomer status. Mac Pros from 10+ years are still being used. The Studio has been available for, what, 2 years?

twolf2919 said:

godofbiscuits said:

I call BS. I'm a developer. There are far less than 10M Apple developer accounts total, while there are between 1 and 2 BILLION iPhones in use. It's not Xcode that keeps the Mac relevant. It's that computers are still relevant, and that laptops are the most popular/useful form factor, and that Apple's are the most versatile and well made.

Why would you call it BS based on what you said? It's obvious that the apps written for those 2B iPhones (as well as however many iPads there are out there) were written on Macs. So whether it's 1 or 10m or 1B developers - they all used Macs. And they're 100% necessary for those developers. What's more relevant than 100% necessity?

But I do think the author is being a bit narrow-minded for sure. I'm also a developer who uses a Mac. And I don't write iPhone or iPad apps - I develop Java apps as well as web apps and the Mac is simply the best development tool available. The only Apple-specific 'Xcode' tool I ever really use is notarytool (to sign my app installers on Mac). Being UNIX based, most of, if not all, the tools available to Linux users are available right out of the box on Macs too. But on top of that, it's got a great *and consistent* GUI - something Linux, after 30 years of existence, still hasn't managed - and a good breadth commercial software offerings. And one never has to worry about this driver and that driver not working on a Mac.

You're making my point. Xcode has little to do with what makes the Mac relevant for Apple. I'd bet there are far more VSCode installs than Xcode installs, and EASILY there are more Mac owners who have never touched any developer tool of any kind, but need or want a Macintosh regardless of what other Apple hardware they own. The Mac stands as important irrespective of Xcode.