William Gallagher
Apple CEO Tim Cook says greenwashing "is reprehensible" and has shown environmental journalists around the company's previously secret data center.
It's another in a series of Tim Cook's post-iPhone 15 launch interviews, but it was rather more substantive than when he was asked which color phone he'd got. This time, media company Brut. (spelt with a period and unrelated to the aftershave), pressed Cook on the environment, starting with buyers don't really need a new iPhone every year.
"I think having an iPhone every year for those people that want it is a great thing," said Cook. "And what we do is we allow people to trade in their phone... and so we then resell that phone if it's still working."
"And if it's not working, we've got ways of disassembling it," he continued, "and taking the materials to make a new iPhone out of."
The interview took place at an Apple data center in Denmark. It's reportedly the first time that Apple has welcomed journalists to the site, where it has previously avoided commenting on the data center.
"We are a very secretive company with our products," said Cook, actually pulling his hands and arms in toward his chest to emphasize the point. "So we want to keep our products to ourselves until they're ready to announce and then announce those to the world and describe those."
"[However, the] environment," he continued. "[It] is different with our initiatives like the environment. We want to be very open because we want to be copied."
Gesturing at the rows of solar panels on the ground surrounding the data center, he said that "we want people to be able to look at this field that we're in today and say 'I can do that too.'"
"We want to be the ripple in the pond that other people can look at and copy," said Cook, "and [that] makes much more effect from an environmental point of view."
Carbon neurtrality through alleged greenwashing
Brut's interviewer criticized Cook's repeated use of the term "carbon neutral," saying that it was close to meaningless. But Cook defended it, saying that in Apple's case it meant taking action, rather than attempting to "greenwash" by deceptively using cheaper ways of offsetting carbon usage.
"I'd invite anybody to look at how we're defining it on our website because what we're doing is doing the hard work to lower our footprint dramatically," he said, "and then whatever is left over after doing all of these actions we offset with with high-quality offsets like managed forests and managed grasslands that pull carbon from the atmosphere."
"But what our objective is to eliminate as much as possible prior to doing that," he continued.
"Greenwashing is reprehensible," said Cook. "And so what if you think about what we're doing, we're doing the work and then saying what we're doing."
"And you're standing in part of the work today [in this field of solar panels], so there's a real proof point," he continued. "The fact that there's 30 percent recycled material on the watch, that's a proof point."
"All of these things are actions that we've taken and they all add up to now a carbon neutral Watch [in certain configurations]," said Cook. " And by 2030, a carbon neutral products across the board."
Cook would not be drawn on the future of the iPhone — except to say that it will be carbon neutral. He did, though, say that Apple's long-standing ambition to be carbon neutral by 2030 is 20 years ahead of the Paris Accords.
-m.jpg)
Charles Martin
Malcolm Owen
Christine McKee
Wesley Hilliard
Andrew Orr
15 Comments
All this accusation about 'Green-washing' is a bunch of baloney. 'Red-washing' is what needs to be looked at. A counter-revolutionary element attempting to derail the transition to going green properly causing this unfounded press. Vigilantly finding out where that is coming from and end it; so everyone can come together resolve the carbon issue. There is this push by those that say they are for climate neutrality trying to actually stop it. Why would those in Denmark want that? Something very odd is happening in that part of the world. Does it have to do with that part of the world not manufacturing or building anything of value and only having 'words' to criticize stop expression and hurt those that 'really' want to help.
@WineCorr The reality is that companies trying to compete with Apple will stoop to whatever means necessary to try and make Apple look bad. Instead of actually investing in resources and brain power to compete with their products, they'd rather pay mass marketing companies to create misinformation campaigns. Sadly, because this seems to be effective on the large number people without critical thinking and analytical skills these days (just as it is with political campaigns around the world), it'll keep happening.