Amber Neely
Apple's Amazon product pages have a minimalistic, ad-free design due to a 2018 agreement, drawing mixed reactions from industry competitors and highlighting the complexities of digital ad negotiations.
In a recent lawsuit against Amazon, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) accused the e-commerce giant and its former CEO, Jeff Bezos, of inundating the platform with irrelevant ads, referred to as "junk ads," to boost profits. However, a notable exception to this trend is Apple product pages on Amazon, which remain relatively ad-free.
According to an internal email, Apple demanded that Amazon exclusively showcase its latest products in search results and maintain clean product pages without non-Apple recommendations.
The email shows that Amazon agreed to allow Apple to sell a wider range of products directly and prevent counterfeit sales. The email correspondence, titled "WW framework terms," showed that Apple wanted a clean presentation to avoid promoting competing brands.
Apple claims that the agreement aimed to address significant counterfeit and safety issues on Amazon's marketplace, and by providing accurate content on Apple product pages, it has reduced the sale of counterfeit and unsafe Apple products on Amazon.
While much of the email has been redacted, what has been gleaned is that Apple was allowed to purchase the slots that would normally feature advertisements. This resulted in cleaner page layouts with minimal or no ads until the bottom of the page, unlike other brands.
Amazon's advertising team told BusinessInsider that they were not authorized to provide this sort of service.
"We balk at companies that want to buy all the ad slots," a salesperson said. "I have never seen, nor do I have the control to give, that type of right."
The clean presentation of Apple product pages on Amazon, free from clutter and competitor ads, has drawn attention and criticism from some of Apple's rivals, including Samsung. Search results for Apple products, such as iPhones and iPads, also exhibit a similar uncluttered experience, in stark contrast to competitors like Samsung and Sony, which often feature multiple sponsored ads.
Another Amazon advertising team member notes that the company had tested similar search offerings in recent years. However, the test appears to no longer be in place.
Wesley Hilliard
Christine McKee
Malcolm Owen
William Gallagher
4 Comments
Spamazon still proscribes HomePod due to not wanting to foment consumer confusion.
I guess I never thought of amazon as an ad site. When I go to Amazon, I’m specifically looking for something, so I don’t really scroll down the homepage. I just type what I’m looking for in the search box. If I’m searching for AA batteries, I expect to see search results from EverReady, Duracell, Energizer, Rayovac, etc. I don’t think of the search results as ads. If I want Energizer specifically, I just ignore everything else and focus on the specific thing I’m looking for. To me, this is totally a non-issue.
When regulators think they know better what is „relevant“ to you than you yourself then this’d is definitely brave new world knocking.
What‘s next? Relevant clothing?
Apart from that: Amazon has probably an expected ad rev. So what‘s the effing issue if his Apple-ness simply pays out JEff and the Gang and in return receives a nice, ad-free experience for their customers?