Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

'Napoleon' is a hit with the box office, but not so much with critics

Image Credit: Apple

Last updated

Ridley Scott and David Scarpa's "Napoleon" for Apple TV+ has been praised as a masterpiece and mocked as a joke, but its early Thanksgiving opening saw it beat "Killers of the Flower Moon" at the box office.

"Napoleon" has just begun its theatrical run and according to Deadline has done well. For the Thanksgiving preview screenings, "Napoleon" took in $3 million, ahead of the $2.6 million that "Flower Moon" got.

With screenings beginning at 3 p.m. local time in selected theaters across the country, "Napoleon" easily beat Disney's "Wish," which earned $2.3 million.

However, "Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes" beat all other comers with a November 21, 2023, preview earning $6.5M. That's actually a 24% increase on its screenings for November 20, 2023.

Box office vs critical success

"Napoleon" is not doing so well with critics — except when it is. The Guardian newspaper, for instance, awarded it five stars and said it was a "thrilling biopic." Except separately, the same publication says its inaccuracies mean the film is a travesty.

And another reviewer in The Guardian, Wendy Ide, says the film "only fully comes alive on the battlefield." Praising the performances and the spectacle, she gives the film three stars.

Currently RottenTomatoes shows the film having a 65% approval rating, based on 132 reviews.

It could well be French reviews that are pulling it down. As first collated by BBC News, French critics have thoroughly taken against the film, its characters, and it's cavalier attitude to historical accuracy.

Le Figaro, for instance, says the film should be renamed "Barbie and Ken under the Empire." French GQ said it was "deeply clumsy, unnatural and unintentionally funny" to see French soldiers in 1793 shouting "Vive La France" with American accents.

Then a Napoleon biographer hasn't just disagree with its accuracy, Patrice Gueniffey says that it is a "very anti-French and very pro-British" movie.

Ridley Scott's response to criticism

Director Ridley Scott, though, has been at best sanguine about France's response, and at worst has sworn at critics.

"The French don't even like themselves" Scott said in one of his more polite moments. "The audience that I showed it to in Paris, they loved it."

Elsewhere, Scott has countered criticism of historical accuracy by asking if the accuser was there in 1793, and telling them to shut up, then.

Apple has not announced a streaming date for the film. However, Ridley Scott has said that he hopes Apple TV+ will stream an extended version.



22 Comments

darkvader 16 Years · 1146 comments

Main takeaway from this article:  Ridley Scott is a dick.
And apparently he needs to stick to scifi and stay away from history.  Nobody cares if Alien movies are historically accurate.

3 Likes · 0 Dislikes
winstoner71 8 Years · 117 comments

darkvader said:
Main takeaway from this article:  Ridley Scott is a dick.

And apparently he needs to stick to scifi and stay away from history.  Nobody cares if Alien movies are historically accurate.

Nobody truly cares if this is historically accurate, outside of history professors and some French film critics. We want to see the spectacle, the huge battlefield sequences that Scott is known for, and want to see Phoenix ham it up. That’s all. Nobody cared that Gladiator wasn’t note for note historically accurate. Good on Ridley for telling them to p*ss off, and come to think of it Adam Driver for doing the same when his film Ferrari got a ridiculous critique…we need more of that from the talent. 

4 Likes · 0 Dislikes
winstoner71 8 Years · 117 comments

Speaking of criticism, you guys could use a proofreader. Some of that was tough to read. 

2 Likes · 0 Dislikes
Wesley Hilliard 5 Years · 282 comments

Speaking of criticism

Rule number 3. If you've got an issue or see mistakes in the article, please send us an email. Complaining in the forums derails the conversation. The topic should be about the news, not how it was written.

Thank you

6 Likes · 0 Dislikes
foregoneconclusion 13 Years · 2862 comments

darkvader said:
Main takeaway from this article:  Ridley Scott is a dick.

And apparently he needs to stick to scifi and stay away from history.  Nobody cares if Alien movies are historically accurate.
Nobody truly cares if this is historically accurate, outside of history professors and some French film critics. We want to see the spectacle, the huge battlefield sequences that Scott is known for, and want to see Phoenix ham it up. That’s all. Nobody cared that Gladiator wasn’t note for note historically accurate. Good on Ridley for telling them to p*ss off, and come to think of it Adam Driver for doing the same when his film Ferrari got a ridiculous critique…we need more of that from the talent. 

Gladiator = 180 AD or thereabouts. Napoleon = early 1800s. There's a LOT more accurate historical information for the latter than the former. Not really sure why Scott wants to go with insults or boneheaded "were you there" comments for this film. He should just admit that he chose to include inaccurate elements and provide the reasoning.

4 Likes · 0 Dislikes