Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Jon Stewart reveals the moment things went bad with Apple

'The Problem with Jon Stewart' [Apple TV+]

Last updated

"The Problem with Jon Stewart" host says that it was over one particular interview that he knew his show was not going to fit in at Apple TV+.

Jon Stewart did originally say that he parted ways with Apple TV+ because the company "didn't want me to say things that might get me in trouble." He later expanded on that to talk about Apple being uncomfortable with a skit about AI.

Now in a new interview with the podcast The Town with Matthew Belloni, he says that the split was a long time coming, but there was a specific moment when he realised that the relationship was not going to work.

"When I realized it was [going] south was, there was an interview with [economist] Larry Summers," said Stewart. "And I had had the idea that using the Fed to whip inflation was ignoring the fact that so much of inflation is corporate profit."

Stewart's argument centered on the idea that corporations were profiting from the COVID pandemic. Summers came ready with figures to show that Apple was profiting hugely at the time.

Summers asked Stewart if he therefore believed that Apple was gouging as he had claimed other corporations were. Stewart said yes, but then said "let's flip that around."

Where Summers believed corporations should be able to charge whatever they can get for their products, Stewart talked about Apple's employees.

"You're [Summers] saying Apple should utilize their strength in, if the market conditions lend it that way, to get as much money as they can," Stewart reports saying. "I'm saying, why can't workers do the same?"

The interview was prerecorded and played back to the show's studio audience to great applause — "they explode like we just a three-pointer at the buzzer" — and then there as a meeting.

"The Apple executives walk into the dressing room afterwards with a look on their face," says Stewart, "and I was like, oh my God, did the factory explode? Like what happened?"

Apple reportedly asked if Stewart was going to use the Summers interview in the aired show. "We went back and forth for a couple of weeks before the show aired that particular moment," says Stewart.

"It was then that I realized, oh, our aims do not work [together]," he continued. "We're trying to make the best, most insightful execution of the intention that we can make, but they're protecting a different agenda."

In the full podcast interview, Stewart is frank about what he sees as his own failings with the first season of "The Problem with Jon Stewart." He's also analytical about Apple rather than blaming it, to the extend that he explicitly denies that he was censored.

"Even at Comedy Central, the deal is I get to do what I want until they think it's gonna hurt their beer sales or whatever it is that they wanna sell," he said. "And that's the deal we all make — nobody is owed a platform."

"And when you're in somebody's house and they want you to take your shoes off," he continued, "you take your f****** shoes off or you go to somebody else's house, right?"

Apple TV+ is "almost a sideline" for Apple

Stewart also says that he was used to working in a situation where what he was doing was central to what a corporation was trying to do. His show could be part of the company's aims and its identity, whereas with Apple and some other large streamers, television is almost a sideline.

"Apple isn't just a content company, they have a whole other side business making, I think, adapters," he said. "So if you think about it, content for them, and I don't wanna say it's a lark, but it is not core to their brand identity."

Then with regards to making content, Stewart also said that Apple had "a very challenging content environment," in trying to set up Apple TV+. "Imagine starting a content company, you have no IP, you literally have no IP, there is no Marvel Universe, there is no Star Wars."

Apple has not commented on the new interview.



24 Comments

blastdoor 3594 comments · 15 Years

I think it is shortsighted of Apple to prohibit content that is critical of Apple or that explores viewpoints that Apple doesn’t like. In the long run, it’s better for Apple to engage productively with people acting in good faith (which I think Stewart does) than to exclude those people from Apple platforms. Productive engagement with Stewart is good for Apples brand AND I think there is a benefit to elevate a critic operating in good faith above critics who are not operating in good faith.

having said all that, I think the main problem with Stewart’s show was that it fell in an awkward space between funny and serious, and ended up being unfunny with the failed attempts at humor serving as a painful/awkward distraction from the serious content. So the show either needed to be reworked or cancelled on those grounds.

but that’s just another example of how apple was shortsighted here. They could have just let the thing die a natural death.

I wonder if Tim Cook spends too much time with CCP operatives and could benefit from more time with people who know how to successfully operate in a democracy.

beowulfschmidt 2361 comments · 12 Years


"Even at Comedy Central, the deal is I get to do what I want until they think it's gonna hurt their beer sales or whatever it is that they wanna sell," he said. "And that's the deal we all make -- nobody is owed a platform."

"And when you're in somebody's house and they want you to take your shoes off," he continued, "you take your f****** shoes off or you go to somebody else's house, right?"

Gods, it's refreshing to hear that kind of sentiment.  But then, it's Stewart.

sflagel 867 comments · 11 Years

Didn't Apple air a show where the heroine ignores the sponsorship directions, Lessons in Chemistry? Stewart is right, you can always go to another house and in today's world, just set up your own website. Good for him (and I do not agree with much of what he says), and us.

As a rule of thumb: stay away from any product that is subsidised by another service or product, like ad-funded TV, ad-funded Facebook, etc. If the product is not good enough that people will pay for it directly, then it should not exist.

jimh2 670 comments · 8 Years

When you are paid by another company to do anything they own you and you follow their rules or suffer the consequences. The fact he will not shut up about shows that no one cares he was canned. Time for him to move on.

regurgitatedcoprolite 287 comments · 14 Years

Jon Stewart, aka Jonathan Stuart Leibowtiz. has had his day. Time for him to hang it up.