Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple streaming TV service negotiations remain divided over $40-per-month pricing - report

Though new Apple TV hardware is expected to appear at an upcoming Sept. 9 event, Apple's long-awaited subscription television service is reaffirmed to remain on hold, thanks to ongoing negotiations with content owners.

Echoing earlier reports, Jessica Lessin of The Information said in a letter to subscribers on Friday that she has been told by sources that the "economics" of a subscription TV service remain the main sticking point between Apple and its potential partners. Specifically, the price Apple wants to charge consumers is said to be too low for content makers, preventing the service from debuting next month.

"There's still a big gap between the price media companies want for their TV channels and the roughly $40 a month Apple wants to charge consumers," Lessin wrote. "Something has to give."

Lessin's sources said that in the absence of a subscription service, Apple will focus on integration with HomeKit accessories, allowing the Apple TV to be a hub for controlling connected devices in the home.

She was also told that Apple plans to spotlight security, highlighting the fact that data will be stored on the Apple TV itself and not in the cloud.

Apple's interest in $40-and-under pricing has been publicized since March. Back then, it was said Apple hoped it could work out a deal to launch the new service, and a new set-top box, by June, in time for its annual Worldwide Developers Conference.

But neither the service nor new hardware were unveiled at WWDC, and the new Apple TV unveiling is now said to be a part of Apple's Sept. 9 event. The device is said to include support for Siri voice control, a new remote with touchpad, and a dedicated App Store for third-party downloads.

Despite the hardware's apparent imminent launch, multiple reports have said the subscription service has been internally delayed to sometime in 2016, due to sputtering talks with major networks like CBS, Fox, and NBC.

But in addition to alleged licensing hurdles, Apple has also been said to lack a network infrastructure capable of feeding what is expected to be a large number of Apple TV boxes. Apple supposedly needs to populate servers around the U.S. with content to ensure a smooth streaming experience, but so far only fields data centers in California, Nevada, North Carolina and Oregon. The company has been building out a proprietary network, but currently leans heavily on Akamai to handle its content distribution grunt work.



102 Comments

mrmiyamoto 9 Years · 22 comments

I wouldn't pay even $40 for such a service.  They'd have to go $30 or less before even piquing my interest when I can just a la carte whatever I want for much cheaper.

maestro64 19 Years · 5029 comments

I personally think that Apple has locked in a few content providers just to show they can do it then others will follow just like they did with shows on iTunes. I'm betting Disney is locked in.

eideard 16 Years · 427 comments

These creeps are NOT content "makers" - they are content "owners.  I'm certain we all understand the difference.

gatorguy 13 Years · 24630 comments

[quote name="Eideard" url="/t/187915/apple-streaming-tv-service-negotiations-remain-divided-over-40-per-month-pricing-report#post_2767272"]These creeps are NOT content "makers" - they are content "owners.  I'm certain we all understand the difference. [/quote] Someone created it and was presumably paid for their expertise /talent, someone paid for the infrasrtucture needed to deliver it to your home, and whoever is viewing it there thinks it's worthwhile to spend time with.... But not worthwhile enough to pay much of anything for? I guarantee Apple will make money on it. and they're simply the end-provider rather than the creative. Surely most here don't think Apple should act like the record labels do: We'll make ours, you're on your own. You need us more than we need you.

jerry602 15 Years · 37 comments

Rather than destroying cable, the biggest story is the threat to the gaming console market, and game sales...