Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

CLSA reports strong, resilient demand for iPhones in China at the expense of Huawei, Samsung

Last updated

Hong Kong broker CLSA reports a continued "loyal following" for Apple in China, noting that half of smartphone buyers intend to buy from Apple, compared to slipping interest figures for Huawei, Samsung and Xiaomi.


2015 Opening of West Lake Apple Store in Hangzhou, China. | Source: Apple CEO Tim Cook via Twitter

Overall, smartphone demand in China is reported to be falling. A CLSA survey of 350 middle class consumers in "tier 1 and 2 cities" found that only 25 percent planned to replace their smartphone, a moderate drop from the 29.7 percent who expressed a purchasing intent last quarter. CLSA's findings were reported by Shuli Ren of Barrons.

China's "city tier" rankings are used by industry research groups and government agencies to categorize regions by their affluence, infrastructure development, economic growth and ability to attract development investment. Apple is targeting tier 1 and 2 cities, including , in its buildout of retail stores in mainland China.

However, despite the overall decrease in buying intent, half of those in the study said they planned to buy an iPhone in December, up from 46.7 percent who said the same in September and inline with the 51 percent who planned to buy iPhones in June.

Because demand in the overall smartphone market has decreased, Apple's maintenance of a high ratio of intent indicates that it has actually grown over the last six months, in addition to outperforming the overall market the same way Apple has consistently outperformed the shrinking PC industry in selling an increasing number of Macs.

The increase in the number of buyers who said they planned to buy an iPhone in December compared to last summer is noteworthy given that Apple reported a 100 percent increase in iPhone sales in China in the September quarter.

Continued consumer interest in Apple's brand has increased primarily at the expense of Huawei (down 1.9 percentage points) and Samsung (down 1.1 points). The report also noted a unspecified drop in intent for Xiaomi.

The data also indicated that three quarters of those who planned to buy a new iPhone already owned a smartphone that was less than two years old; 25 percent had bought their existing phone within 2015, and 52 percent had bought a phone in 2014. CLSA analyst David Murphy cited this as evidence of "a loyal following" for Apple in the country.

Despite a troubled economic outlook for China's markets, buyers said on average they'd be willing to pay as much as 6,033 yuan (about $915) for an iPhone, a 22 percent premium over the average price of a new iPhone, cited as being 4,953 yuan ($750).

Interpretation of rumors suffering from surfacing data

CLSA's survey findings support the data reported in parallel by China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, which indicated 33 percent growth for "non-Android phones" over the year-ago quarter, reaching roughly 24 million units in the December quarter. Apple's iOS represents 90 percent of the non-Android smartphones sold in China.


Source: MIIT, Stifel

In September, Apple's chief executive Tim Cook noted that the company was on track to exceed its 74.5 million iPhones sold in the previous December quarter. However, since then a series of supply chain rumors have asserted that Apple would cut orders from its suppliers in the March quarter, inciting a panic surrounding the idea that iPhone 6s sales are troubled.

A series of smartphone suppliers have also warned of worse than expected results for the December quarter, but their troubles may likely be linked to another supplier: Samsung, which has itself warned investors to expect poor smartphone performance under increased competitive pressure.

Apple has repeatedly warned that rumors of supply chain cuts do not and can not provide a clear picture into the company's operations. Previous rumors floated by the Wall Street Journal and Nikkei of supposed supplier cuts as large as 50 percent did not result in any observable change in the number of iPhones that were actually sold.



14 Comments

Deeeds 8 Years · 29 comments

A Chomsky-like "self interest" argument for most online media's flagellation of all things Google might well explain the likely western absence of reporting on this, and the doomsaying around anything Apple related.
Not a conspiracy, it's wildly observable, and obvious.

'peak iPhone' is the divergence from "market saturation" talk, which turned out to not be a thing for smartphones, despite years of predicting it would be.

So rather than say (and immediately be called out for it) that iPhone market saturation is being reached, they're saying "peak iPhone" in the vain hope someone will believe this, and read it as a tipping point for Apple.


Why?

This is an interesting question.

Apple's rival controls both an enormous amount of online advertising distribution, and the direction, nature, intent and quality of traffic and interest.

Media outlets rely on traffic and interest for advertising revenue.

And Google's value is directly related to their ability to get in front of consumers, and pull data from them, too.

🎄
anantksundaram 18 Years · 20391 comments

Cue the statistically-challenged comments starting with "but it's only 350..." (On the assumption, of course, that it was truly a random sample of likely middle class smartphone consumers). 

🎄
normm 16 Years · 653 comments

I was just looking at the Gartner data for second quarter 2015 (I think the rest of the year was similar).  World smartphone sales up 13.5% year over year, Apple iPhone sales up 36% year over year.  Smartphone sales down 4% in China, Apple iPhone sales up 68%.

sockrolid 14 Years · 2789 comments

Deeeds said:
A Chomsky-like "self interest" argument ...

“If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.”

 
- Noam Chomsky

❄️
lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

I’m seeing Dilger’s AI articles starting to show up in financial news aggregators. If, as @sog35 laments, Tim Cook is remaining silent and unresponsive to all the “peak iPhone” negatives at least Dilger is getting some positive news out there.