Katie MarsalA small patent licensing firm hopes to skim profits from Apple and other top smartphone makers by suing them for allegedly violating no less than ten patents relating to GSM phone technology and voice encoding.
The 23-page complaint asserts that Apple, Palm, and BlackBerry inventor Research in Motion are all violating as many as ten patents WiAV is allowed to use that concern either the use of the GSM cellular network standard in smartphones or the Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR) format for compressing voice in the process of making a phone call.
In a fashion not uncommon in these lawsuits, the patents are non-specific and touch on technology as generic as systems for detecting voice and silence, altering music to accommodate voice, and power management in a mobile device.
It's not known as to how well Apple or any of the other defendants can respond to the allegations, although GSM itself is far from a new standard and first saw use in cellphones during the early 1990s. AMR became an official part of the GSM format in 1998, two years before the first of WiAV's patents.
The lawsuit isn't helped by WiAV's insistence on the participants in the suit. It only has ownership of two of the patents and is hinging the rest of its case on the terms of its license with Mindspeed, which owns the remaining eight. The plaintiff has the right to sue as part of its patent licenses but is forcing Mindspeed into the complaint as at least an involuntary plaintiff and even hints that the license holder may become another defendant if the court sees fit.
Expectedly, the lawsuit asks for a permanent injunction barring all three of the smartphone designers from continuing to make and sell products it believes violate the patents, and hopes to collect a "reasonable royalty" plus interest as its reward.
Neither Apple, its fellow defendants, nor unwitting lawsuit partner Mindspeed have commented on the filing.
-m.jpg)
Marko Zivkovic
Christine McKee
Andrew Orr
Andrew O'Hara
William Gallagher
Mike Wuerthele
Bon Adamson
-m.jpg)
11 Comments
...yawn... these are getting old...
Tort reform tort, reform, my kingdom for tort reform!
My god. Enough already. These companies are like patent vulchers.
I can understand when a company creates an actual product that utilizes a unique enough technology that requires a patent to protect it. But companies like this one make no products and want to reap the reward of companies that actually have.
How about this? I patented air. At the time, it didn't seem useful, but now it seems like its so obvious and essential that no one even gives it a second thought. Time to collect. Every creature on this earth owes me a royalty.
I wants to becomes one of them lawyer type things, so I can make moneys from peoples who acutually works and makes things. Do you have to go to schools, or is it a kinda way yous born or what? If I just sue everybody for something, won't at least somebody pays up?
If the GSM design/system is at least 2 years before any of their patents, then HOW IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS SACRED can an implementation of GSM infringe them?
The patent system is screwed up. There's no way that you should be able to patent concepts and ideas! Only a solid implementation, and only that implementation, not the concept that it is an implementation of.
On the other hand, at least patents are only some 20 years in length. That's the limit that someone can get their inventions protected. Somehow 'creative inventions' get life + 50 years via copyright, something's unfair there, eh?