Katie MarsalThe New York Times revealed this week an internal memo from Condé Nast announced the company will have the April edition of GQ available for the iPad. That will soon be followed by June issues of Vanity Fair and Wired, while The New Yorker and Glamour will follow in the summer. The publisher will reportedly test a number of different prices, types of advertising, and approaches to reproducing content for the iPad as it experiments with the new format.
According to Peter Kafka of MediaMemo, the different approaches will mean that iPad versions of most Condé Nast magazines will be similar to their existing iPhone versions. While the publisher did show off a highly interactive version of Wired that it intends to release for the iPad, other publications allegedly will not receive the same treatment.
"Conde is still creating a digital version of its tech magazine for the device," Kafka wrote. "But the influential publisher says it won’t create similar iPad apps for other titles unless Apple and Adobe figure out how to work together."
Condé Nast Chief Executive Chuck Townsend said that the interactive version of Wired was originally created with Adobe's help and uses the Adobe Flash platform. Apple's iPad does not support Flash, which will lead the publisher to have "two parallel development tracks," MediaMemo reported.
When asked if his company would embrace the Adobe format if the iPad were compatible with Flash content, Townsend also reportedly said it would be "an easy yes."
"The GQ app for the iPhone is pretty good, by the way, and I’m assuming it will work well on the iPad, too," Kafka wrote. "But it's a pretty straightforward transfer of the print version into digital form, and doesn’t feature the bells and whistles that Wired and Adobe dreamed up."
Adobe has announced plans to circumvent the inability of both the iPad and iPhone to run Flash content, with a native app porting feature built into its forthcoming Creative Suite 5. While Adobe has pushed for years to have Flash on the iPhone since it launched, Apple has not budged. The company's rejection of Flash and move towards alternatives such as HTML5 suggest the Web plugin will not likely appear on the iPad.
As he has promoted the forthcoming iPad, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs has been attributed as saying Adobe Flash is a "CPU hog," and calling the prevalent Web format "old technology." Another report alleged that Jobs called Adobe "lazy," and said most Mac crashes are due to Flash.
For more on why Apple isn't likely to support Flash in the iPhone OS, read AppleInsider's three-part Flash Wars series.
-m.jpg)
Amber Neely
Andrew Orr and Mike Wuerthele
William Gallagher
Charles Martin
Wesley Hilliard
Marko Zivkovic
Malcolm Owen
84 Comments
Sounds like this to me:
"Yes, we love the idea of creating a new way to charge for our near-worthless content, however we have no intention of spending more than 5 man hours to develop it as it would eat into our costs."
Condé Nast needs to cut their losses on Flash and move on. Even without Apples help Flash is on the decline, it's only true supporters coming from the advertising industry, for it's ability to force feed ads.
The NYT and AP have plans for iPad versions of their publications, now magazine powerhouse Conde Nast has announced its intent to create iPad versions of its magazines. I don't think this will hurt their print sales so much. Possibly some. But overall, it may mean more readers, and more eyes on their ads - which is what they ultimately want.
If it will be loaded with FLASH crap, then no subscription for you.
It doesn't sound like the readers of their publication are going to miss the Flash content much. If it catches on Conde Nast will find a way.
By the way, Conde Nast-- if you port away from Flash you won't have "two baselines to support"... you'll have one. HTML5.