Apple was awarded the patent, titled "Method and apparatus for administering the operating system of a net-booted environment," on Tuesday. However, Macs have been capable of booting from a network since the inclusion of the NetBoot feature in the original version of Mac OS X Server.
The patent application describes an environment where "a network computer (NC) system including an NC server and multiple NC clients is managed by an NC client causing the remainder of the NC clients that are subsequently booted to receive operating system software that is configured differently than that currently in effect by replacing one or more system volumes on the NC server containing the operating system software with one or more different system volumes."
The invention simplifies administrator management of multiple network clients by allowing the administrator to customize or update system volumes from any network computer. The software updates and customizations would then be available for any network client to boot from.
Cameron Stuart Burse and Keith Stattenfield are listed as the inventors. The patent was filed for in July 2006 and is a continuation of a patent application from October 1999.
Despite being over 10 years old, the patent has relevant applications today as users have come to perform more tasks over a network, namely the Internet. Apple's patents for a "net-booted environment" could lay both the technological and the legal framework for a version of Mac OS X that moves into the cloud.
Apple rival Google has been pursuing the cloud-based Chrome OS for several years, though the OS has been the subject of numerous delays. Chrome OS, which is based off of Google's Chrome browser, was originally slated to ship by the middle of 2010, but has now been delayed until the first half of 2011.
The search giant has made the Cr-48 notebook, test hardware running Chrome OS, available to some users. Critics of Chrome OS have called it "needless" and "dangerous."
Paul Buchheit, a former Google employee who created Gmail during his time there, predicted in December that "Chrome OS will be killed next year (or "merged" with Android."
Microsoft is also pursuing its own cloud-based operating system, Windows Azure, which will allow applications to run from Microsoft's datacenters.
In October, Microsoft's Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie, who had led the push for cloud computing and internet services, resigned from his role. Steve Ballmer, CEO of the Redmond, Wash., software giant, stated that Ozzie would not need to be replaced.
In 2009, an embarrassing data loss on the Microsoft servers for the Sidekick raised doubts about Microsoft's reliability in cloud computing efforts.
49 Comments
Haven't OS X had net boot since like 1998?
You think the Chrome OS is scary? BOOTING purely off the cloud can be scarier. What would happen if you have no internet connection, you can't even boot your device. What if you made Apple angry, they could discontinue your booting licence. How would Apps work, also off the cloud (I assume this is predominately aimed at iOS, not OS X)? If so, then what if they decide to pull an App for some reason, with no local copy you could be out some money (Kindle Books anyone?).
Having a Chrome OS netbook thing myself, I can say that the device isn't anything to call home about. Its instant on, instant off, and its great to get online quickly. I DO worry about the "cloud", be it from Google, Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, etc. I do NOT trust any outside company with all my information, so I don't put it all out there, and I suggest you do not either. (How do you know ANY of the above companies will truly delete your data stored on their servers)
So, I am currently making my own "Cloud Server" at my house, so that I have FULL control over my own data, my own pictures (minus ones other people take), my own apps, who can log in, and who I can share information with. (Once its done, I'll leap off of the other "clouds")
We all know that Google is tracking our online moves with the Chrome OS Netbook, its part of the deal. Because of this, it isn't exactly "free". But say we buy an iOS device that boots purely off the cloud, who knows what Apple is tracking (who knows what they are tracking now?), but if we try to go "off the cloud", then we will have no access at all to our device and all its data... and that is what scares me.
(At least with the CR-48, when I'm on my home network and the internet goes down, I can still boot and access my internal services.)
Am I Pro Google? Not particularly, they have their definite faults that I could go into.
Also, can't we already boot our OS X from a Network? And all those Linux distro's out there, can already boot off the network easily! So, since this net-booting idea is already in place by quite a few places including the open source community, what does that say? Maybe I read it all wrong.
Would Apple really do something this boring? It's boring to me, a complete geek, so what about Apple's target audience, normal consumers?
NC Server? Is that like a North Carolina server?
Haven't OS X had net boot since like 1998?
This is more interesting.
Having a Master Server cluster blasting various configurations to deployed sites in an automated fashion is just scenario that comes to my mind.