A revenue comparison published by Asymco blogger Horace Dediu demonstrates that Apple's hardware-centric business model is now enabling the company to generate 3.5 times the profits earned by Microsoft licensing Windows to third party PC makers.
While both companies have long developed rival desktop and mobile operating systems, Apple has almost exclusively used its software to drive hardware sales, while Microsoft has derived almost all of its Windows-based revenue by licensing its software to others.
During the 1990s however, Microsoft quickly outpaced Apple's growth in both revenues and profits by bringing DOS and then Windows to a much wider audience, prompting observers to insist that Apple needed to mimic the same business model to remain relevant.
Apple eventually began licensing both its Mac OS and its Newton OS, but neither effort resulted in success. After founder Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, the company terminated both of its operating system licensing programs and began focusing on using its software assets to sell the company's own hardware instead.
While other companies that attempted to copy Microsoft's licensing-centric business model also failed (including Palm and Be, Inc), there was not much optimism held out for Apple to be able to significantly expand its Mac hardware sales as a proprietary platform.
However, Apple has not only dramatically increased its Mac sales over the past half decade four fold, but has also added a huge new influx of mobile devices running iOS. Over the same period, Microsoft has struggled to replicate its Windows-like licensing business among mobile devices.
The result, as noted by Dediu, is that Apple is now generating $9.8 billion in profits from its operating systems through hardware sales, while Microsoft reported sales of $4.445 billion and profits of $2.764 billion from its Windows licensing.
While Mac market share is hovering around 9 percent of all PCs sold, Mac OS X itself generates half the profits of Windows for Apple. Separately, iOS generates 2.3 times the profits of Windows.
Dediu contrasts Apple's growth with the overall PC industry, "which has seen both volume and sales decline while prices have eroded along with profitability. On top of that, growth has nearly evaporated."
33 Comments
Apple deserves credit for its amazing success, as does Microsoft.
But I'm not sure the success of either company can be reduced to their licensing models. Both models have been used by many other companies and, more often than not, both models fail.
Perhaps the success of these two companies can be attributed to their meeting customer demands, and their failures (which they've both had) attributed to failing to meet customer demands?
If you buy a Mac.... Apple gets money from both the hardware sale as well as the software.
When you buy a Dell... only Dell gets the hardware sale... while Microsoft gets a small license fee for the software.
I'm not sure how this is news... but OK
If you buy a Mac.... Apple gets money from both the hardware sale as well as the software.
When you buy a Dell... only Dell gets the hardware sale... while Microsoft gets a small license fee for the software.
I'm not sure how this is news... but OK
Still, Apple is more profitable than both combined. Dell only made $927 million last quarter.
Dan wrote an article without using the words "frantic" or "desperate". I'm kind of impressed.
I still maintain Microsoft's shoddy approach to OS design has cost people and businesses untold billions of dollars in lost productivity. I'm so happy I went Apple 20+ years ago!
Best