Google's attempt to publicly shame Apple, Microsoft, Oracle and other companies who either collect royalties from its Android licensees or have ongoing legal cases involving intellectual property disputes associated with Android made headlines Wednesday.
However, the CPTN consortium of companies (including Apple and Microsoft) that bid for the Novell patents are themselves competitors in the mobile space, but have stated that they jointly bid on the patents to prevent the portfolio of intellectual property from falling into the hands of a patent troll that could work to derail the entire industry with years of lawsuits.
Additionally, according to Brad Smith, the general counsel of Microsoft, Google refused to join the group bidding on the Novell patents, instead bidding separately for the collection of patents in hopes that it could win them all for itself, just as had earlier done on a portfolio of around 1,000 patents from IBM.
In a tweet, Smith stated, "Google says we bought Novell patents to keep them from Google. Really? We asked them to bid jointly with us. They said no."
Google's chief legal officer David Drummond took the similar Rockstar consortium to task for "escalating the cost of patents way beyond what theyâre really worth," complaining that "Microsoft and Appleâs winning $4.5 billion for Nortelâs patent portfolio was nearly five times larger than the pre-auction estimate of $1 billion," without also noting that Google itself had been involved in raising the ultimate price of the patents far higher than any patent troll could ever pay, after refusing to join the consortium in the first place.
In describing Google's public denigration of the consortiums led by Apple and Microsoft and the company's depiction of the winning bids as being a concerted effort to attack Android, blogger John Gruber wrote "Googleâs hypocrisy here is absurd," and added, "Google supporters claim that Google only wants to use patents defensively. But what exactly does Google need to defend against, if not actual patents Android actually violates?"
86 Comments
Oh Google.
Oh Google.
Google is a disreputable company, run by slime-balls. This truth is plain for all to see, that is for anybody paying attention and who isn't sucking at their teet.
I doubt their plea for public opinion favor pans out, and I cherish the day when the courts decide against them.
Google is a THIEF and a LIAR.
Oh Google.
Oh DED.
Google is a disreputable company, run by slime-balls. This truth is plain for all to see, that is for anybody paying attention and who isn't sucking at their teet.
I doubt their plea for public opinion favor pans out, and I cherish the day when the courts decide against them.
Google is a THIEF and a LIAR.
Sad to see an admired company slowly devolve ethically. Although, it wasn't that slow, many years ago they already were planning infringement when developing Android, as court documents/ leaks are starting to show.
Now this Google lawyer blog post. Something is definitely fishy when a lawyer writes trying to sound like a hippie.