After drawing criticism for its rules regarding in-app subscriptions, Apple modified its terms ahead of a June 30 deadline to allow third-party subscriptions and purchases sold outside of the App Store to be offered at a lower price than those within an iOS app.
But, the changes weren't enough for FT, which disagreed with Apple's remaining rule forbidding external links within an app to purchase content.
The publication's apps remained in the App Store for two months after the deadline, but paidContent reports that they have now been removed. Interestingly enough, the company's app won an Apple Design Award last year.
FT asserts that its biggest issue with Apple is its control over subscriber data, not the 30 percent cut that the iPad maker insists on taking.
Given that the company saw 10 percent of roughly 100,000 new digital subscriptions come from the iPad last year, as many as 10,000 users could be affected by the change. The paper has seen its digital subscriptions nearly double since the original iPad was released in 2010.
âThe FT iPad and iPhone apps will no longer be available to new users through iTunes,â said a spokesperson. âWe are directing readers to the FTâs new web app available at app.ft.com. iTunes will remain an important channel for new and existing advertising based apps.â
The newspaper launched a HTML5-based web app in June as a workaround to Apple's policies. The web app appears to have met with instant success, as FT already claims 550,000 users of the app, which is accessible through mobile Safari.
Meanwhile, other app makers such as The Wall Street Journal, Amazon and Barnes & Noble, have complied with Apple's rules by removing purchasing options from their applications.
The Chinese edition of the Financial Times, which is free, and Financial Times Deutschland, which is no longer run by the FT Group, will both remain on the App Store
55 Comments
Newspaper sites in particular should be using HTML5 apps and not cluttering up the App Store with stuff that is perfectly suited for HTML5. I agree with the decisions of both parties in this case.
apple's draconian in-app subscription policy is a mistake...
What a fantastic result for Apple!
Nothing quite says "win" like getting important applications pulled from your app store.
Maybe this will even spawn secondary cross-platform HTML5 app stores for subscription-based content. That will really prove Apple is sticking it to them.
What a fantastic result for Apple!
Nothing quite says "win" like getting important applications pulled from your app store.
Maybe this will even spawn secondary cross-platform HTML5 app stores for subscription-based content. That will really prove Apple is sticking it to them.
You don't get it. They don't need to be in anyone's app store. It makes no sense at all. It's redundant. Just go to the website.
You don't get it. They don't need to be in anyone's app store. It makes no sense at all. It's redundant. Just go to the website.
I do get it. I was just being facetious.