The finding, reported by FOSS Patents blogger Florian Mueller, overturns a July ruling by ITC judge James Gildea, which determined that none of the S3 patents were relevant to Apple's iOS products, but that Mac OS X did infringe upon of one of the four S3 patents involved in the complaint. That patent involved a image compression technique.
Judge Gildea noted at the time that Macs using Nvidia graphics have an implied license to use the patent. His ruling required a six member ITC committee to uphold his decision in order for any action to be taken, including the potential of blocking of imports of affected Macs into the US.
Instead, the committee found no infringements by Apple at all, a clear setback for S3. The decision was likely influenced by AMD, which filed a motion in September to intervene and terminate the investigation on the basis that it, not S3, actually owned rights to the patent.
S3 was recently acquired by Taiwanese smartphone maker HTC, which hoped to use S3's patents as leverage in negating its way out of Apple's own patent infringement complaints targeting its use of Android.
A different judge ruled that HTC's own smartphones and Flyer tablet were infringing two Apple patents, and Apple has since brought a second suit against HTC, while HTC and S3 have both raised a second complaint of their own against Apple.
While HTC's S3 patents targeted technologies implemented within third party chips Apple uses in its Macs, Apple's patent complaints against HTC involve technical infringement core to the implementation of Android itself, meaning that if the patents are upheld by the ITC's committee, the finding could also be used against other Android makers, including Motorola and Samsung.
31 Comments
I'm getting really tired of hearing about patents.
I have an idea. I think all AI posters should donate money to me. I'll sign us up for some vague patents and profit for us. I'll need your paypal please...
Now it's time to go nuclear on manufacturers using Android. LOL
Apple spends years of R&D in their products which includes legal issues that could arise.
How many times have we heard that there is a product in R&D that we don't see for 2 or 3 years later.
Sometimes it is waiting for some particular component that is required to be ready for everyday use.
Sometimes it is waiting to file patents and research of any said patent does not conflict.
Sometimes it is lawyers giving the go ahead to release to manufacturing.
It is like that in most honest and ethical companies looking to launch new products.
With all that being said the reason Apple (Mr. Jobs) didn't blink is because they knew they had the industry dead to rights.
Other MFG's trying to copy Apple products got cocky thinking they could do what they wanted.
When Apple started litigation with these companies they thought they could scare Apple but now with courts siding more and more with Apple you see the rest of the industry is getting very nervous if not a little scared.
Case in point, Samsung redesigned tablet.
I believe when all is said and done Apple will be standing on the top industry with several companies, shells of there former selves (including Google with Android).
I can see a day when Google could possibly be shunned by mfg's incorporating any services or products in new products and equipment like Logitech has just done.
Apple spends years of R&D in their products which includes legal issues that could arise.
How many times have we heard that there is a product in R&D that we don't see for 2 or 3 years later.
Sometimes it is waiting for some particular component that is required to be ready for everyday use.
Sometimes it is waiting to file patents and research of any said patent does not conflict.
Sometimes it is lawyers giving the go ahead to release to manufacturing.
It is like that in most honest and ethical companies looking to launch new products.
With all that being said the reason Apple (Mr. Jobs) didn't blink is because they knew they had the industry dead to rights.
Other MFG's trying to copy Apple products got cocky thinking they could do what they wanted.
When Apple started litigation with these companies they thought they could scare Apple but now with courts siding more and more with Apple you see the rest of the industry is getting very nervous if not a little scared.
Case in point, Samsung redesigned tablet.
I believe when all is said and done Apple will be standing on the top industry with several companies, shells of there former selves (including Google with Android).
I can see a day when Google could possibly be shunned by mfg's incorporating any services or products in new products and equipment like Logitech has just done.
I agree about Apple's due diligence, I believe based on past experience with Microsoft SJ didn't intend Apple to get ripped off again. I hope you are right on your future vision.
Sounds like another nail was just pounded into the HTC Android coffin. I bet they regret spending tens of millions for the S3 patents.