According to a filing (PDF) submitted to the US Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York, Apple states that Kodak is seeking authority to "enter into a $950 million postpetition financing facility secured by security interests in and liens upon substantially all of Kodakâs assets, including certain patents that are subject to ongoing patent ownership and patent infringement disputes between Kodak and Apple."
In the filing, Apple notes that the dispute involves "pioneering work on digital camera and imaging technology and related hardware, software, and user and communication interfaces" dating back to the early 1990s, when Apple partnered with Kodak "to explore how the two companies could work together on various projects including commercialization of Appleâs digital cameras."
Apple states that "through this collaboration, Apple disclosed the architecture for its confidential digital camera technology to Kodak subject to various non-disclosure agreements, which also provided that any improvements Kodak made to Appleâs disclosures remain the property of Apple."
QuickTake quick takeaway
The company also notes that Kodak was "was the leader in film-based cameras at the time." In 1994, Apple released the $749 QuickTake 100, which Time profiled last year as "the first consumer digital camera" and ranking among its "100 greatest and most influential gadgets from 1923 to the present."
Apple partnered with Kodak to design and manufactured the camera, which was built by Japan's Chinon. Apple subsequently built a series of QuickTake cameras, later partnering with Fuji, before exiting the digital camera market in 1997 after Steve Jobs returned and began working to simplify the company's product line in an effort to return to profitability.
Apple now states that it "became aware in 2010 that Kodak had misappropriated Appleâs technology and sought patents of its own claiming this technology," noting that in early 2010 it had "launched an extensive internal investigation into Appleâs prior relationship with Kodak relating to the development of digital camera technology."
All Kodak's base belong to us
After completing the investigation, Apple brought suit against Kodak in August 2010, arguing Kodak's '216 patent made "improper claim to ownership of Appleâs technology," a legal issue that is still being sorted out in court.
Apple further notes that Kodak has turned this '218 patent, related to "a digital camera capable of capturing an image while previewing the scene to be captured on an LCD screen," into what Apple called "the centerpiece of Kodakâs patent assertions," noting that Kodak has sued Sony, Matusushita, JVC, Samsung, and LG and "claims to have reached royalty-bearing licensing agreements with each of these companies."
Apple also states that Kodak has further '218 litigation pending against RIM, HTC, Fujifilm, and Samsung. So far, Kodak claims to have received $3 billion in licensing revenue from this patent.
As the patent's actual owner, Apple says it "is entitled to restitution of all or a substantial portion of the licensing revenues that Kodak has obtained based on its improper claims to ownership of the â218 patent and potentially other patents sought based on Appleâs innovations and technology."
64 Comments
I tend to believe Apple here. Had they been Kodak's IP they would have sued when Apple went with Fuji one would think.
Sounds like Apple has a strong case here, but man does this look bad considering the state Kodak is in. Hell, it might better for Apple to let one of their competitors waste money buying Kodak for patents Apple owns.
PS: I question the implication of the article since Kodak had plenty of digital camera patents long before the deal with Apple. Just because Apple made the first consumer camera doesn't mean their pre-1994 patents wouldn't apply.
Looks like Apple may be getting Kodak lock, stock, and barrel after all. Go Apple!
Looks like Apple may be getting Kodak lock, stock, and barrel after all. Go Apple!
I didn't consider that because Apple tends to buy upstarts not sinking ships but they might very well be interested in absorbing Kodak. THey certainly aren't going to last long enough to sue them. I wonder if Apple has talked with them internally about a buy out.
First consumer digital camera?that?s an Apple innovation I?d totally forgotten! I badly wanted one of those monstrous low-res QuickTakes when they first came out, despite still being an Apple hater in those days.