TSMC began generating revenues from its 28nm chips in the fourth quarter of 2011, when they accounted for about 5 percent of the company's sales, according to DigiTimes. But later in 2012, TSMC is expected to "significantly ramp up" production of 28nm chips.
The company's 40/45nm production took about a year and a half of production until the process contributed 10 percent to company revenues. That ramp-up schedule was slowed because the company saw yield problems in that size range.
TSMC is said to currently have a decent yield rate on its 28nm processes, but the company remains cautious on expansion, partially because the 28nm process is so new to the industry.
For example, Apple, one of the largest users of mobile processors, still relies on the 45nm manufacturing process for its latest-generation A5X ARM CPU found in the third-generation iPad. Apple is said to have viewed newer chips as a potential risk to their products, and have stuck with older processes to ensure availability and reliability.
But the custom chips Apple put in its new Apple TV and iPad 2 have been seen as evidence that the company is testing the 32nm chipmaking process. Moving to a smaller 32nm node allows the chips to be more efficient, allowing for improved battery life in iOS devices.
Apple's primary chipmaker remains Samsung, though Apple was said to have signed a major foundry agreement with TSMC last year to build future ARM-based process. One report last September claimed that Apple would use a 28nm process for a so-called "A6" processor, while an A7 chip would rely on the even smaller 20nm process.
Last month, it was also revealed that TSMC was tapped to produce power management integrated circuits for future iPhones and iPads.
Rumors have suggested that Apple has looked to forge a closer alliance with TSMC to move away from rival Samsung, with which Apple is engaged in a series of lawsuits.
15 Comments
would be nice if it is going into the new iPhone...
if Not, it will be in the next new iPad
GlobalFoundries made this all possible and TSMC and Samsung later teamed up with them to certify ARM.
GlobalFoundries Ramp up of 28nm: http://news.radio-electronics.co/gen...balfoundries./
Tech Overview: http://globalfoundries.com/technology/32-28nm.aspx
ARM Cortex A9MP 28nm certiifcation: http://www.electronictechnology.com....l&newsid=34241
This bad boy is about to be ready for business: http://www.economist.com/node/21552607
Yeah, it would be good for Apple to not rely too much on a company that also makes a competing product. If they are moving away from Samsung for mfg of screens, processors and memory, then Samsung is going to eventually lose their business, or a large portion of it.
GlobalFoundries made this all possible and TSMC and Samsung later teamed up with them to certify ARM.
GlobalFoundries Ramp up of 28nm: http://news.radio-electronics.co/gen...balfoundries./
Tech Overview: http://globalfoundries.com/technology/32-28nm.aspx
ARM Cortex A9MP 28nm certiifcation: http://www.electronictechnology.com....l&newsid=34241
This bad boy is about to be ready for business: http://www.economist.com/node/21552607
It would be awesome if Apple shifted a lot of their purchasing from Sammy to GlobalFoundries, great to see a company based in the US. What a fabulous set up. Thanks for the link.
It would be awesome if Apple shifted a lot of their purchasing from Sammy to GlobalFoundries, great to see a company based in the US. What a fabulous set up. Thanks for the link.
?look at now many Android phone/tablet builders crashed because they bet on something that wasn't quite ready in a rush to market.
I agree as long as GF can fulfill the demand and produce a reliable product i.e., better to stay a step back and optimize where it is a sure thing than to bet on an unknown. I suspect this why Apple let them have the power mgmt, etc. as sort of a trial run.