According to Normand Painchaud, the lawyer who first filed the suit in Quebec Superior Court in February, Canadians who purchased an ebook from Apple within the past two years could be partially recompensed if the Cupertino, Calif., company is found guilty of price fixing, reports The Montreal Gazette.
The lawsuit, which is identical to the antitrust suit initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice as well as a corresponding investigation by the European Commission, claims that Apple and five large publishing houses illegally worked together to raise ebook pricing.
âPrices have definitely gone up,â Painchaud said. âSo consumers could be eligible for damages.â
Painchaud went on to say that his lawsuit is the first of three to move forward in Canada, with the other two requests waiting for approval in British Columbia and Ontario. The lawyer notes that if any of the suits are successful, damages would most likely be distributed to all Canadian ebook owners who made purchases on or after Apr. 1, 2010.
At issue is Apple's so-called "agency model" which allows publishers to set ebook pricing under a "most favored nations" clause that contractually obliges the companies to not sell the same content through another reseller at a cheaper price. The "agency model" is far more attractive to publishing houses than the "wholesale model" previously used by Amazon to offer below-cost pricing in order to draw customers.
The Quebec class-action suit was filed under the name Antoine Pontbriand and reads:
The anti-competitive nature of this conspiracy, and the Publisher Respondentsâ motivation to control ebook pricing, is also revealed by the fact that the price of an ebook in many cases now approaches â or even exceeds â the price of the same book in paper even though there are almost no incremental costs to produce each additional ebook unit.The publishing houses HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster, Hachette, Macmillan and Penguin are the publishers named alongside Apple in the allegations.
Painchaud warned that the lawsuit could take years to resolve, however HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster and Hachette have already settled out of court in the U.S. which may a sign of willingness to do the same in Canada. Now that the three publishers have settled, they will most likely resume dealings with Amazon based on the "wholesale model."
Apple denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to fight the allegation in U.S. federal court. The company has made no official statement regarding the new Canadian suit.
51 Comments
I can't help but wonder if some one is behind this. Such as the giant amazon. Lobbying (paying off politicians) to go after Apple.
I don't see how being accused of something in one country would lead to any finding of liability in another. This should be thrown out rather quickly.
The fun will really begin if the DoJ case against Apple collapses, given that more than half the US states (and now Canada) have jumped on to the bandwagon.
If the DoJ loses, how will the courts in the other cases justify decisions against Apple?
PS: Like the new look.
The fun will really begin if the DoJ case against Apple collapses, given that more than half the US states (and now Canada) have jumped on to the bandwagon.
If the DoJ loses, how will the courts in the other cases justify decisions against Apple?
PS: Like the new look.
You are missing a key difference m8y.
The case in Canada is a civl suite, and the one in the USA is the state against Apple; I'm not saying the case has any legs, however you cannot jump the gun and call a lawsuit off so easily in a totally different country with completely different laws that do not conform to kissing the ass of big business.
I don't see how being accused of something in one country would lead to any finding of liability in another.
This should be thrown out rather quickly.
Not if the laws are similar.